[RPPTL LandTen] Damages for alleged violation of 83.49(1)?
Dennis Chen
dennis at chenlaw.net
Fri Jul 29 10:28:10 PDT 2016
I agree with Leonard's assessment regarding the need for multipliers on
attorneys fees. I think the changes to the landlord tenant law in 2013
make the need for multipliers even more important because it made fighting
eviction cases more difficult for tenants. In the almost 20 years that I
have been practicing I am not aware of any significant changes to the law
that were in favor of tenants. The law has become progressively more in
favor of landlords. Then there was the Stanley decision. A multiplier is
necessary for an attorney to take cases on a contingent basis.
Dennis A. Chen, Esq.
Chen Law Firm, PA
13360 W. Colonial Dr, Ste. 470
Winter Garden, Florida 34787
Tel: (407) 392-1872
dennis at chenlaw.net
Civil Litigation * Landlord/Tenant * Real Estate Litigation
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachment, contains
legally privileged and confidential information and is intended solely for
the recipient. Should the intended recipient forward this message to any
person or entity, that action could constitute a waiver of the
attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this
communication was sent or received in error, please notify us by reply
e-mail and delete the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/landten/attachments/20160729/7189bd5d/attachment.html>
More information about the landten
mailing list