[RPPTL LandTen] Residential lease with divorcing landlords

[Leonard Cabral]

I would not let my client wait for an eviction. If there is a dispute
regarding who gets paid the rent I would file an Interpleader and let the
divorcing landlords duke it out.

 

Leonard Cabral

leonardcabral at cfl.rr.com

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Eric Jacobs
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 08:58
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Residential lease with divorcing landlords

 

I would pay rent to whoever the landlord under the lease is.  Alternatively,
I would wait and put it in the court registry

Sent from my iphone

 


On May 10, 2012, at 8:40 AM, "Law Offices of Scott A. Frank"
<sfrank at saflaw.com> wrote:

Here's the situation:  Landlord is listed on lease as Bob and Sara Smith.
Tenant has always made checks payable to "Bob and Sara Smith" and mailed
them.  Earlier this month, Bob brought the uncashed May rent check to the
house and asked for a replacement check.  He told the tenant that Bob and
Sara were divorcing, and that the house was staying with Bob.  He showed the
tenant a recorded quitclaim deed from Sara to Bob.  He also told the tenant
that Sara had left the country to go home.  With the deed as evidence, the
tenant wrote the check to Bob alone.   The next week, Sara came to the house
screaming for her rent.  The tenant told her he had paid Bob.  She did not
accept the explanation (although there is a language issue as well, so I
cannot guaranty how much she understood).  She came back 2 days later
screaming again.

 

Tenant is now nervous that she may try to serve a three-day notice.  If and
when she does, I know that the obvious defense is one of payment, but I
would like to hear from some of the residential eviction pros out there as
to how strong the tenant's defense will be, or if you think she actually has
a shot at eviction if he doesn't pay the rent again.

 

And with respect to June rent, my inclination is to advise him to write the
check jointly, unless he receives written instructions from both of them
otherwise.  While I would not put it past the husband to forge the wife's
name, at least in that instance it would not be the tenant's problem.  Any
thoughts on that issue as well?

 

As always, thank you for your insight.

 

 

Scott A. Frank

Attorney at Law

LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT A. FRANK, P.A.

7781 NW Beacon Square Boulevard, Suite 102

Boca Raton, FL 33487

p:  (561) 372-7860

f:  (561) 423-5721 

sfrank at saflaw.com

www.saflaw.com <http://www.saflaw.com/> 

 

If you believe that you have received this message in error, please notify
the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or
disclosing it.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service guidance, be advised that any federal
tax advice contained in this written or electronic communication, including
any attachments or enclosures, is not intended or written to be used and it
cannot be used by any person or entity for the purpose of (i) avoiding any
tax penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service or any
other U.S. Federal taxing authority or agency or (ii) promoting, marketing
or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

 

_______________________________________________
landten mailing list
landten at lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20120510/ef37f5ac/attachment.html>