[RPPTL LandTen] Commercial Landlord Tenant Materials

[Michael Grant]

I agree with Albert.  

 

In addition, you may want to move to require the tenant to pay the past
due rent into the court registry. 

 

Good luck, 

 

Michael Grant 

 

Michael L. Grant, Esq.

RICHARD B. WARREN, P.A.

1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 1006

West Palm Beach, FL  33401

Telephone: (561) 681-9494 | Facsimile: (561) 681-9436

WWW.RBWARRENLAW.COM

 

 

 

The information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and
confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient or an employee or
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this transmission
(including any attachments) is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by
reply e-mail.  Thank you.

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Alberto M
Cardet
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:38 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Commercial Landlord Tenant Materials

 

The "residential" vs "non-residential" Summons that are used in
Miami-Dade provide much more advice or warnings to the defendant than
the "non-residential".  The "residential" summons states you have 5 days
to answer, you need to post rent into the registry etc. the
"non-residential" says you have 5 days to answer and that is it.  So the
defendant has more knowledge of the law if served with the
"residential".  I don't understand the basis for a motion to strike
because of the misnomer of the summons.  How was the defendant
prejudiced.  I say take your chances in Court.

 

Albert

 

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Beverly
Barnett
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:12 AM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Commercial Landlord Tenant Materials

 

Good Morning!

 

I am doing a commercial eviction.  The summons that I used stated
"residential" at the top instead of "non-residential".  The opposing
attorney has done a motion to strike my summons because it does not say
"commercial" at the top.  In Pasco County, the summonses are exactly the
same except for it stating "non-residential" at the top.  Should I serve
it again or take my chances in court?

 

Beverly R. Barnett, Esq.

Thornton, Torrence & Barnett, P. A.

6709 Ridge Road Suite 106

Port Richey, FL 34668

727-845-6224

 

The information contained in this transmission is attorney privileged
and confidential.  It is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above.  If the reader of this message is not the addressee,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by returning the
original message to us.  Thank you. 

________________________________

From: landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Tequisha
Myles
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 10:45 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Commercial Landlord Tenant Materials

 

Good Morning!

Does anyone have any pro se educational materials on commercial landlord
tenant law?  I have a 70 year old individual who is seeking information
on how to defend himself in a commercial landlord tenant case.  Legal
Aid Society does not represent commercial tenants and I don't have
anything to give him about his rights or responsibilities a commercial
tenant. 

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated!

 

Tequisha Y. Myles, Esq.

Fair Housing and Elder Law Projects

Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County

423 Fern Street, Suite 200

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

(561) 655-8944 Ext. 296

(561) 655-5269 Fax

tmyles at legalaidpbc.org <BLOCKED::BLOCKED::mailto:tmyles at legalaidpbc.org>


 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20110919/dbc785a3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17596 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20110919/dbc785a3/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Stanley v Quest Intern Inv Inc.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 54220 bytes
Desc: Stanley v Quest Intern Inv Inc.doc
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20110919/dbc785a3/attachment-0004.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Poal Wk Taft LLC v Johnson Medical Center Corp.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 50746 bytes
Desc: Poal Wk Taft LLC v Johnson Medical Center Corp.doc
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20110919/dbc785a3/attachment-0005.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 214 Main Street Corp v Tanksley.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 43444 bytes
Desc: 214 Main Street Corp v Tanksley.doc
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20110919/dbc785a3/attachment-0006.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Premici v United Growth Properties LP.DOC
Type: application/msword
Size: 51438 bytes
Desc: Premici v United Growth Properties LP.DOC
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/private/landten/attachments/20110919/dbc785a3/attachment-0007.doc>