[RPPTL-constructionlaw] [RPPTL] - Would CILB violate the Younger GC below?

[fred.dudley at hklaw.com]

The disciplinary grounds (after a license has been approved) require an unpaid lien or judgment.

Frederick Dudley | Holland & Knight
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
315 South Calhoun Street, Suite 600 | Tallahassee FL 32301

Phone 850.425.5668 | Fax 850.224.8832 | Cell 850.294.3471

fred.dudley at hklaw.com <mailto:fred.dudley at hklaw.com> | www.hklaw.com <http://www.hklaw.com/>
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


From: mromm at rommlaw.com [mailto:mromm at rommlaw.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 03:24 PM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw <constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] [RPPTL] - Would CILB violate the Younger GC below?

Financial Irresponsibility????  Scenario below?

"I introduce "Younger GC" to   "Older GC" and younger GC goes to work for older GC's company.  Younger GC agrees to work only for older GC's company and to develop older GC's business. They both agree that Younger GC shall, under his old company name, complete all existing jobs of which there are not many.  Later, younger GC asks older GC for a loan to finish a two jobs because he took money to do the jobs, and spent the money before the permits were issued. He did not have enough money to finish the jobs.  It is unknown whether the jobs were ever finished. During his employment Younger GC promises verbally (and in writing when he signed his resignation letter)  to pay back the loan.  He made similar verbal promises after he left his employment. It is now obvious to older GC that he is not going to be paid back his money.  Can older GC threaten younger GC with a complaint to the CILB regarding younger GC's financial irresponsibility in failing to properly manage the funds on the two jobs and also for refusing to pay back older GC for the loan in order to inspire younger GC to repay the loan? If such a complaint is made, will the CILB sanction younger GC? Or,  is this improper for older GC to make the threat in order to get paid the money back.

Michael Romm
Michael R. Romm, P.A.
1213 S. 30th Avenue, Suite 2, Hollywood, FL 33020
Phone: (954) 557-8002
Fax:  (954) 208-0022
mromm at rommlaw.com<mailto:mromm at rommlaw.com>



________________________________

****IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE IRS, WE INFORM YOU THAT ANY TAX ADVICE CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION (INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS) IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF (I) AVOIDING TAX-RELATED PENALTIES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, OR (II) PROMOTING, MARKETING, OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TAX-RELATED MATTER HEREIN.****

________________________________

NOTE: This e-mail is from a law firm, Holland & Knight LLP (“H&K”), and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of H&K, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to H&K in reply that you expect it to hold in confidence. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert of H&K, you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege that may be available to protect confidentiality.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120506/5accbf3a/attachment.html>