[RPPTL-constructionlaw] 713.10 lien for private leasehold on public land
fred.dudley at hklaw.com
fred.dudley at hklaw.com
Thu Feb 2 12:18:16 PST 2012
Of course, when the tenant leaves their leasehold is worth.....?
Frederick Dudley | Holland & Knight
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
315 South Calhoun Street, Suite 600 | Tallahassee FL 32301
Phone 850.425.5668 | Fax 850.224.8832 | Cell 850.294.3471
fred.dudley at hklaw.com <mailto:fred.dudley at hklaw.com> | www.hklaw.com <http://www.hklaw.com/>
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
From: David Mankuta [mailto:dbm at atkinson-diner.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 03:02 PM
To: 'RPPTL constructionlaw' <constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] 713.10 lien for private leasehold on public land
I think under that circumstance you have an absolute right to lien >> but probably only the lessee’s interest. However, that could be very good leverage as I imagine that the public entity would not want a stranger to step in and take over the building and, therefore, they will pressure the lessee to pay up.
David B Mankuta, Esq.
Board Certified in Construction Law
dbm at atkinson-diner.com<mailto:dbm at atkinson-diner.com>
www.atkinson-diner.com<http://www.atkinson-diner.com/>
Atkinson, Diner, Stone, Mankuta & Ploucha, P.A.
One Financial Plaza, Suite 1400
100 S.E. 3rd Avenue
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394
Tel: (954) 925-5501
Fax: (954) 920-2711
From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Rafael Perez
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:56 PM
To: constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] 713.10 lien for private leasehold on public land
Does anyone have any authority for a construction lien on a leasehold where the lessee is a private party but the lessor is a municipality (i.e. on public land)? The lessee contracted for the improvements which were required by the lease agreement. The only authority I have found is Section 8.3 of the Fla. Prac. Construction Law Manual which states in the first paragraph, in part: “However, there may be private leasehold interests on governmental property that are lienable.� I have found no other authority.
Rafael A. Perez
Board Certified Construction Attorney
McArdle and Perez, P.A.
806 S. Douglas Road, Suite 625
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
305-442-2214
Fax 305-442-2291
rperez at mcper.com<mailto:rperez at mcper.com>
________________________________
****IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE IRS, WE INFORM YOU THAT ANY TAX ADVICE CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION (INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS) IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSE OF (I) AVOIDING TAX-RELATED PENALTIES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, OR (II) PROMOTING, MARKETING, OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TAX-RELATED MATTER HEREIN.****
________________________________
NOTE: This e-mail is from a law firm, Holland & Knight LLP (�H&K�), and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of H&K, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to H&K in reply that you expect it to hold in confidence. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert of H&K, you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege that may be available to protect confidentiality.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120202/a62d0089/attachment.html>
More information about the constructionlaw
mailing list