[RPPTL-constructionlaw] [RPPTL-construction law] E - D I S C OVE R Y starts September 1....

Fri Aug 17 11:14:50 PDT 2012

yes there is interest!
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Adair, Perry 
  To: Daniel Greene ; RPPTL constructionlaw 
  Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:50 PM
  Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] [RPPTL-construction law] E - D I S C OVE R Y starts September 1....

  I (along with Dan DeSouza of our firm) have lectured several times on the  new Florida rules and eDiscovery matters. 

  Happy to put on something for this group if there is interest. 

  It is a topic that every attorney doing any kind of civil litigation needs to know something about.

       Perry M. Adair
        Attorney/Managing Shareholder

       Alhambra Towers
        121 Alhambra Plaza, 10th Floor
        Coral Gables, FL 33134

        305.260.1016 Phone
        305.442.2232 Fax

        PAdair at becker-poliakoff.com
        www.becker-poliakoff.com

  Our clients' total satisfaction is our #1 priority.  The Becker & Poliakoff Client CARE Center is available for questions, concerns and suggestions. Please contact us at 954.364.6090 or via email at CARE at becker-poliakoff.com. 

  From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Greene
  Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:38 PM
  To: RPPTL constructionlaw
  Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] [RPPTL-construction law] E - D I S C OV E R Y starts September 1....

  All:

  Michael suggested I pass this on to everyone. It was what he was looking for.

  I told Michael to check the Ontario Bar Association web-site.  Their E-discovery forms and information are very useful.

  Best regards,
  Daniel Greene
  Daniel M. Greene, P.A.
  Florida Board Certified in Construction Law
  Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil and Appellate Mediator
  P.O. Box 3092
  Orlando, FL 32802-3092
  407-448-5391
  www.dangreenelaw.com
  dangreenelaw at yahoo.com
  dangreenelaw at gmail.com
  To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35), we inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. 
  ___________ 
  NOTE: This e-mail is from Daniel M. Greene, P.A., and is intended for the recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to Daniel M. Greene, P.A. that you expect to be confidential. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

  From: "mromm at rommlaw.com" <mromm at rommlaw.com>
  To: RPPTL constructionlaw <constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org> 
  Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 1:19 AM
  Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] [RPPTL-construction law] E - D I S C O V E R Y starts September 1....

  Fellow Members:   I recently read in an ACEDS article about the following:   Did you know that there is a law firm in California that is now being sued for malpractice due to an E-Discovery screw up?   The case involves allegations that J-M Manufacturing Co., of Los Angeles, through its former lawyers at McDermott Will & Emery and e-discovery service providers, Navigant and Stratify, repeatedly disclosed nearly 4,000 privileged documents to adversaries and the US government in a federal False Claims Act lawsuit. Who thinks that under 502 these inadvertant disclosures will be recovered by the Clawback Rule?    Judge Wu issued an opinion which is attached. 

  This case led me to thinking about Florida's new E-Discovery Rules:

  Florida's new E-Discovery Rules take effect on September 1, 2012.  I know of several larger law firms that have already assembled their E-Discovery Committees, developed internal practices and procedures, created E-Discovery Compliance Checklists, E-discovery litigation forms for use in litigation, fine tuned their litigation hold letters; and they have already retained or interviewed third party vendors.  In the case of the smaller firms, such as my solo law practice, I have also convened an E-Discovery Committee, but mine is a committee of 1 (me). 

  I am sure there are a number of CLC Members who have a similarly sized law firm.    I met with myself and voted unanimously to create internal practices and procedures to comply with the new E-Discovery Rules, create compliance checklists and E-Discovery litigation forms, etc.  However, I would welcome and appreciate the benefit of any firm that has prepared any documentation related to E-Discovery that they might be willing to share with our committee.  For example:  

  1.    Litigation hold letter forms (to our own clients and a different form to the opposing party).

  2.    E-Discovery compliance Checklist

  3.    E-Discovery Compliance Forms such as:

          A.   a  new form for a  Request for Production of Documents that specifically addresses the following:

  (a)    emails

  (b)    duplication

  (c)    de-duplication

  (d)    Twitter

  (e)    Facebook

  (f)     PDA's , I-Phones, I-Pads, Cell-Phones, Blackberry's; PDA's (federal and state courts have already ruled                these are all fair game);

  (g)    production format?  with or without source and header information? metadata, etc.

  (h)    Text Messages

  (i)     Etc.

  Because emails and text messages are so easy to use and expedite communications, people tend to be less formal about what they say in an email or a text. If you think discovery concerning this type of communication is not crucial, just ask any one of the 85,000 people employed worldwide at the prestigious accounting firm of Arthur Andersen!  OOOps.  You can't ask them!  They all lost their jobs!  As discussed in a recent Florida Bar Journal article:  "The classic example is Arthur Andersen's shredding of Enron-related documents. Several e-mails by Andersen's employees candidly remarked and joked about the shredding of thousands of crucial auditing materials. The result: Those e-mails surfaced, and today Andersen no longer exists".

   Thanks in advance to anyone who contributes!.  Michael Romm

  Michael Romm

  Michael R. Romm, P.A.

  1213 S. 30th Avenue, Suite 2, Hollywood, FL 33020

  Phone: (954) 557-8002

  Fax:  (954) 208-0022

  mromm at rommlaw.com

  _______________________________________________
  constructionlaw mailing list
  constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org
  http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  constructionlaw mailing list
  constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org
  http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120817/bbbd241d/attachment.html>