[RPPTL-constructionlaw] Public Project Bond and SOL

Thu Apr 19 07:02:29 PDT 2012

If the lienor requested a copy of the bond from the contractor or owner
and did not receive one, then the lienor may have rights against them
for failure to provide a copy, but that will not excuse the lienor's
failure to timely perfect its claim against the surety.  Bridgeport,
Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co. (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Bridgeport, Inc. v. Rinker
Materials Corp., 849 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Mursten Const. Co.
v. C.E.S. Industries, Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Lee A. Weintraub
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.
Emerald Lake Corporate Park
3111 Stirling Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312-6525

954.985.4147 Phone
954.985.4176 Fax

LWeintraub at becker-poliakoff.com
http://www.becker-poliakoff.com

Our clients' total satisfaction is our #1 priority. The Becker & Poliakoff Client CARE Center is available for questions, concerns and suggestions. Please contact us at 954.364.6090 or via email at CARE at becker-poliakoff.com. 

Go to http://www.floridaconstructionlawauthority.com/ to subscribe to our complimentary Florida Construction Law Blog.
________________________________

From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
Tracye
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:58 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Public Project Bond and SOL

Does anyone know of a case that would estop a surety from relying on the
SOL to defeat a subcontractor claim when it denied (in writing) that a
bond was in place during the SOL period?

Tracye K. Solove, Attorney at Law

Certified Civil Circuit Mediator

Tracye at solovelawfirm.com

Kendallwood Office Park One

12002 Southwest 128th Court

Suite 201

Miami, Florida  33186

Phone: (305) 612-0800

Facsimile: (305) 612-0801

http://www.solovelawfirm.com <http://www.solovelawfirm.com/>

Providing Statewide Legal Services in the areas of Commercial
Collections and Recovery, Creditors' Rights, Commercial Landlord/Tenant
and Real Estate Foreclosures

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named
addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential,
proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If
this notification is received by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s), the recipient(s) should immediately notify the undersigned
by E-MAIL and by telephone and obtain instructions as to the disposal of
the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used,
copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) except with the express written consent of the sender.
Thank you.

From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
Bruce Partington
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:31 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: Bond coverage

From: Gibbons, Michael [mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Bruce Partington
Subject: Bond coverage

  Good question Bruce.  My thoughts:

    1.  Take a look at Phoenix Indemnity v. Board of Public Instruction
of Alachua County, 114 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).  The Phoenix
Indemnity court held that the contractor's surety bond was liable for
payment of insurance premiums not paid by contractor despite contractor
having an express contractual obligation to make the premium payments.
Not exactly your claim but close and certainly gets at the obvious issue
that your claim is not for completion of the bricks and mortar (which
every surety lawyer wants to limit the surety bond coverage to).

    2.  Is there an issue of who suffered the damage and the operation
of the mutual waiver of subrogation clauses doubtlessly present in the
contracts at issue?  Could not tell in your summary but I believe this
may be an issue.  If the GC had insurance coverage for the claim (which
it sounds like) and would simply like to have the sub's policy be
primary on the loss, then there may be an issue with actual damages
suffered by GC (given the presence of insurance).  Also, if the loss
falls on the carrier, depending on the operation and breadth of the
mutual waiver of subro language, there may not be any subrogation rights
arising out of the loss (especially a property loss).

   3.  Is there an issue re operation of a mutual waiver of
consequential damages provision in the incorporated subcontract (either
directly or by reference or incorporation of the prime contract
documents)?  Not clear whether the category of damages being claimed
would fall into the "consequential damages" bucket but it sounds like
that might be the case.

   4.  The AIA A 312 bond form is broad in scope and contains some
favorable language for the obligee.  Without knowing all the facts, it
sounds like there may be a colorable claim if some of the above raised
concerns are addressed (as well as others which I have failed to
identify).

  Good luck.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio
<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons> )

Shareholder

Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.

450 South Orange Avenue, 8th Floor

Orlando, FL 32801

Phone: 407-418-6378

Fax: 407-843-4444

email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com

website: http://www.lowndes-law.com

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the
attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information
and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information
which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise
confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an
addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such
recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction,
re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail
communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly
prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail
communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance
either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately
delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all
physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or
other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for
"spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply
or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e.,
potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching
us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply
or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the
same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending
communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive
by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that
this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may
contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax
issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230)
require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that,
unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not
written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the
addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties
imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting,
marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the)
transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein.
Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with
respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s)
addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its
particular circumstances. [v4.30]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120419/aa37962e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 7190 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120419/aa37962e/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3183 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120419/aa37962e/image002.jpg>