[RPPTL-constructionlaw] Bond claim issue
William L. Grant
WGrant at shutts.com
Fri Apr 13 11:54:09 PDT 2012
There is a statute. Section 713.23 says: “(5) A waiver and release of lien pursuant to s. 713.20<http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0713/Sections/0713.20.html> given by a lienor shall constitute a waiver and release in a like amount of the lienor’s right to make a claim against a payment bond under this section.” There is at least an argument the same would apply to a 255.05 job, since courts regularly rely on 713 when the answer is not in 255.05.
From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:29 PM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Bond claim issue
Larry Leiby will have the site at his fingertips, but there is caselaw that says lien waivers are enforceable to waive rights against a payment bond.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Shareholder
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson at gray-robinson.com<mailto:Reese.Henderson at gray-robinson.com>
GRAY | ROBINSON<http://www.gray-robinson.com/>
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
________________________________
From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Glenn T. Williams
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 2:18 PM
To: constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Bond claim issue
Any help with the following would be very appreciated:
Subcontractor signs progress payment release of lien rights in the form of Section 713.20(4) (after supplying all materials and performing all work). It’s a government project, there are no lien rights. Same Subcontractor has a bond claim for amounts unpaid (there is both a Section 255.05 bond and a subcontractor common law bond potentially applicable). Is the progress payment release of lien enforceable against Subcontractor to prevent Subcontractor from getting paid the unpaid subcontract amounts?
Thank you very much for your time, and I truly appreciate any help!
Glenn Todd Williams, Esq.
Attorney | Board Certified in Construction Law
Glenn Williams, P.A.
Angebilt Building - Downtown 37 N. Orange Ave, Suite 500
Orlando, Florida 32801
Telephone: 407-926-4100
Facsimile: 407-926-4105
gtwlaw at ymail.com<mailto:gtwlaw at ymail.com>
[cid:image001.jpg at 01CD1985.455E11B0]
This email message including attachments, if any, is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain attorney-client confidential and/or privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message including attachments. Thank you.
Pursuant to federal regulations imposed on practitioners who render tax advice ("Circular 230"), we are required to advise you that any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. If this advice is or is intended to be used or referred to in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement, the regulations under Circular 230 require that we advise you as follows: (1) this writing is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on a taxpayer; (2) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed by the written advice; and (3) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
</pre>IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: Pursuant to recently enacted<br>U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required<br>to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated,<br>any federal tax advice expressed above was neither<br>written nor intended by the sender or this firm to be<br>used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose <br>of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under U.S. tax <br>law. If any person uses or refers to any such tax advice<br>in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or<br>other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any <br>taxpayer, then the advice should be considered to have<br>been written to support the promotion or marketing by a <br>person other than the sender or this firm of that <br>transaction or matter, and such taxpayer should seek<br>advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances<br>from an independent tax advisor.<br><br><br>The information in this email transmission is privileged<br>and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient,<br>nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to<br>the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any<br>dissemination or copying of this transmission (including<br>any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have<br>received this email in error, please notify the sender by<br>email reply. Thank you.<br><pre>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120413/0a693b1b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5026 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20120413/0a693b1b/image001.jpg>
More information about the constructionlaw
mailing list