[RPPTL-constructionlaw] General pre-incident release for inspection

[Albert Franson]

Charles,

I do not know of any cases.  However, I would think that a motion for a protective order would be appropriate with the requested relief being not to allow the inspection because of the unsafe condition of the building or alternatively to have the Court impose a condition that the inspection may proceed only if releases and proof of insurance are provided prior to the inspection.



Albert T. Franson
Board Certified in Construction Law
Franson  & Iseley, P.A.
1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 100
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Telephone: (904) 396-1800
Facsimile: (904) 396-1804

Franson & Iseley, P.A.  E-Mail Confidentiality Notice
This transmission may be:  (1) subject to the attorney -client privilege; (2) attorney work product; or (3) strictly confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this information in error, please reply, notify the sender, and delete the message.  Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal law.

From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Charles Kramer
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 12:06 PM
To: 'RPPTL constructionlaw'
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] General pre-incident release for inspection

Dear Fellow Members,

                Anybody know of any case law determining plaintiff may require a pre-incident release for defendant's experts to conduct a 1.350 inspection of premises which are known to be compromised and may be unsafe?

Highest regards,


[cid:image001.png at 01CC7E8E.81B96B10][cid:image002.jpg at 01CC7E8E.81B96B10]


CONFIDENTIALITY: This electronic message transmission contains information from the law firm Rogers, Morris & Ziegler LLP that is considered confidential or privileged.  The information is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone (954-462-1431).



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20110929/833beddb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 17552 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20110929/833beddb/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3857 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20110929/833beddb/image002.jpg>