[RPPTL-constructionlaw] 489.128 Fla. Stat. & failure to have a certificate of authority

[Justin Zinzow]

Committee members:  Please pardon the interruption.  I have the following question:  If a contractor business organization did not have a certificate of authority at the time of contract, does the 489.128 penalty apply?

I am aware of the 2006 Lake Eola Builders decision saying the penalty does not apply, but one of the primary bases of that holding was eliminated from the statute in 2009 (deletion of the savings clause indicating that failure to hold a certificate of authority did not deem the contractor unlicensed if a licensed individual applied for such a certificate).

Does anyone have any knowledge as to why the legislature made this amendment in 2009?

[cid:image002.jpg at 01CCA2CD.7A767240]Justin R. Zinzow | Zinzow Law
AV Rated Board Certified
Construction Specialist

(727) 787-3121
Website<http://www.zinzowlaw.com/> | Bio<http://www.zinzowlaw.com/attorney-profiles/Justin-Zinzow/>











35111 U.S. Highway 19 N. *  Suite 302 * Palm Harbor, FL 34684 * Fax (727) 787-3231
[cid:image003.gif at 01CCA2CD.7A767240]            [cid:image004.jpg at 01CCA2CD.7A767240]          [cid:image005.gif at 01CCA2CD.7A767240]       [cid:image006.gif at 01CCA2CD.7A767240]
NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 727-787-3121 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender.  Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, are not intended to be advice to avoid tax laws or penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 188198 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4287 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2981 bytes
Desc: image003.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/image003.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2300 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/image004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2857 bytes
Desc: image005.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/image005.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2857 bytes
Desc: image006.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111114/6abdb763/image006.gif>