[RPPTL-constructionlaw] Expert: Fire codes

[Richard A. Burt]

Thanks, Joe.  Very helpful.

From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Joseph G. Thresher
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:24 PM
To: 'RPPTL constructionlaw'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Expert: Fire codes

Some thoughts---
There are cases that have held that testimony about interpretation of codes is not admissible when offered by a design expert experienced in applying code;  the argument being that interpretation of code is a matter of law not fact and testimony on issue of law is not competent evidence. On the other hand there is a FDOT rule case involving outdoor advertizing which held that evidence of past practice of agency (FDOT) responsible for interpretation and enforcement,  may be offered as evidence of proper meaning to be given to code.
Because you have period of actual application of code by then competent agency, and no change to code language ( I assume ) then that prior interpretation may be a basis for interpreting code as applied to your specific facts. The interpretation and enforcement of safety codes include judgment, consistently exercised, for period of time may be a basis to preclude the inquiry itself (absent a new and permissibly retroactive safety code requirement).
Good Luck
Joseph G. Thresher
813-229-7744
From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Richard A. Burt
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 11:26 AM
To: 'RPPTL constructionlaw'
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Expert: Fire codes

Everyone,

I have a client who has owned an apartment building which has housed college students for over 20 years.  Up to this year, the state conducted an annual inspection of the building and its units; each year the building and units passed inspection.  Recently, the inspection function was transferred to the local fire department.  The local fire inspector has cited the client for inadequate egress, stating that a door leading into a bedroom of a number of units must remain unlocked at all times.  This would render these apartments non-rentable costing the client hundreds of thousands of dollars in income and drastically reducing the building's value.  Despite pleas by the client and his architects and engineers, who have suggested a number of options to achieve the objective of the egress requirement, the fire department inspector will not budge.

Can anyone identify an expert in the area of fire codes in effect in 1969-1970 and currently?

Thanks.

Richard A. Burt, Esq.

Richard A. Burt, Esq.
BURT & BURT
220 So. Ridgewood Avenue
Suite 200
Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
(386) 252-2090 (office)
(866) 240-7043 (facsimile)
dick at burt-burt.com<mailto:dick at burt-burt.com>
www.burt-burt.com<http://www.burt-burt.com/>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20110322/0e4fe028/attachment.html>