[RPPTL-constructionlaw] Is anyone in the group barred beforetheUS Supreme Court?

[Michelle Kane]

I am admitted to practice before the Supreme Court.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 14, 2011, at 9:59 AM, "DuffC at gtlaw.com" <DuffC at gtlaw.com> wrote:

> I am.
> 
> If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster at gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate such information.  Pursuant to IRS Circular 230, any tax advice in this email may not be used to avoid tax penalties or to promote, market or recommend any matter herein.
> From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Eric Belsky
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 7:52 AM
> To: RPPTL constructionlaw; Rgilbert at TheConstructionLawyers.com
> Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Is anyone in the group barred beforethe US Supreme Court?
> 
> Does “barred” mean admitted to practice?  If so, then yes I am.
> 
>  
> 
> Leiter || Belsky
> 
> <image003.jpg>
> 
> Eric G. Belsky, Esq.
> 
> Leiter & Belsky, P.A.
> 
> Blackstone Building, Third Floor
> 
> 707 Southeast Third Avenue
> 
> Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316
> 
> 954.462.3116  Telephone
> 
> 954.761.8990  Facsimile
> 
> ebelsky at jlblaw.com
> 
> *** IMPORTANT NOTICE ***  This e-mail is a confidential attorney-client communication or privileged work-product or both, intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not print, forward, copy or otherwise disseminate this e-mail. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by "Reply," and permanently delete the entire message, including any attachments. The sender and intended recipient of this e-mail expressly reserve any and all rights to assert the above-described privileges, and do not waive any such rights by virtue of an erroneous transmission or dissemination of this e-mail. However, this statement is not intended to, and shall not be construed to, in any way limit the assertion of any additional or further legal rights or privileges that the sender or intended recipient may have to limit or prohibit any further dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this e-mail.
> 
>  
> 
> From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Randall Gilbert
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:36 AM
> To: constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org
> Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Is anyone in the group barred before the US Supreme Court?
> 
>  
> 
> Please respond to Rgilbert at TheConstructionLawyers.com if you are.  Thank you.
> 
>  
> 
> Sincerely yours,
> 
>  
> 
> Randall Gilbert, Esq.
> 
> Board Certified Construction Lawyer
> 
>  
> 
> <image004.jpg><image005.gif>
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> constructionlaw mailing list
> constructionlaw at lists.flabarrpptl.org
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111214/0969522a/attachment.html>