[RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: SB 1196 - Construction Warranties

Tue Dec 13 11:10:52 PST 2011

Since the Florida Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction over the
appeal of the Maronda Homes case, shouldn't the legislature wait to see
what happens before advancing a bill overturning the 5th DCA's decision
before the Florida Supreme Court has a chance to issue its opinion? 

Brian W. Bennett

Board Certified Construction Attorney

Page, Eichenblatt, Bernbaum & Bennett,P.A.

214 E. Lucerne Circle

Orlando, Florida 32801

Phone (407) 386-1900

Fax   (407) 386-1901

The information contained in this electronic mail message is privileged
and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named.  If the reader of the message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by
telephone at (407) 386-1900 or reply email and delete this message.

________________________________

From: constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 1:40 PM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: SB 1196 - Construction Warranties
Importance: High

Folks:  Please see the attached.  I am soliciting comments from CLC
members before formulating a response to the higher-ups with the RPPTL
section.  Due to the time-sensitive nature of these things, I will only
be able to include responses received by COB today.

Thanks,

Reese

Reese J. Henderson, Jr.

Shareholder

GrayRobinson, P.A.

50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100 

Jacksonville, Florida 32202

Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109

Email: Reese.Henderson at gray-robinson.com

GRAY | ROBINSON <http://www.gray-robinson.com/> 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

<http://www.gray-robinson.com/> 

This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named
within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and
confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a
client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the
attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended
recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party,
that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might
constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we
apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete
the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail
message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship
with the sender.

Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this
firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax
penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any
marketing or promotional materials.

Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector
and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be
used for that purpose.

________________________________

From: Freedman, Robert S. [mailto:rfreedman at carltonfields.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:33 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Subject: SB 1196 - Construction Warranties

Reese, I am not sure if I sent this one to you previously.  Does the CLC
have a position on SB 1196 (attached), as introduced by Senator Bennett?
This is the homebuilders' legislative attempt to reverse the Maronda
Homes decision, and also narrows the common law doctrine in Gable v.
Silver.   The Condominium and Planned Development and the Real Property
Litigation committees have both advised that they are opposed to the
proposal.  Pete is meeting tomorrow with the homebuilders'
representatives (one of whom is Chris Dudley, Fred's son, for purposes
of disclosure) to discuss the proposal.  We do not have a Section
position at this point in time, but want to consider one and need to
know the CLC's thoughts.  Please advise at your earliest possible
convenience, and sorry for the rush.  Regards, Rob

Robert S. Freedman
Attorney At Law

4221 W. Boy Scout Boulevard, Suite 1000
Tampa, Florida  33607-5780 

direct 813.229.4149
fax 813.229.4133
rfreedman at carltonfields.com
www.carltonfields.com 
bio <http://www.carltonfields.com/rfreedman/>  
vcard
<http://www.carltonfields.com/attorneys/AttorneyVCard.aspx?id=1349b8e2-6
b70-4b00-8561-970086e865cf>  

Confidential: This e-mail contains a communication protected by the
attorney-client privilege or constitutes work product.  If you do not
expect such a communication please delete this message without reading
it or any attachment and then notify the sender of this inadvertent
delivery.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111213/635ec926/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1701 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111213/635ec926/image001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1456 bytes
Desc: image002.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/constructionlaw/attachments/20111213/635ec926/image002.gif>