<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Georgia;
panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light";
panose-1:2 14 5 7 2 2 6 2 4 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:#642828;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle26
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Georgia",serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle27
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:205486797;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:-1068704758 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:582446215;
mso-list-template-ids:-1676484474;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style></head><body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal">Fred & most esteemed colleagues:</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">About 40+ years ago the use of expert witnesses in court cases was the exception not the rule. This was before my time… If there is a perceived way to increase a party’s chance of prevailing in a case, it is sensible for a party with the financial means to use that additional tool. Fred brings up many valid points about the potential persuasiveness of a “hired gun” with a jury and the value of a truly neutral expert witness. I think there are ways of accomplishing Fred’s goals without requiring special certifications or excluding certain expert witnesses. </p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">There are several alternatives:</p><ol style="margin-top:0in" start="1" type="1"><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0in">Choose binding arbitration – an expert’s report will be less persuasive to a knowledgeable expert in the construction field, or</li><li class="MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left:0in">File a motion for the court to appoint a neutral witness. </li></ol><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">I have been a Construction Panel member for the American Arbitration Association since 2014. I have a Civil Engineering degree and worked as a project engineer in the mid 1990’s before going to law school. I occasionally find errors in experts witness reports. Only about half of the AAA panel members are attorneys, many are professionals with expertise in their fields.</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">If you file a motion to appoint a neutral expert witness, a significant consideration of the court will be how to pay for the neutral expert witness. The proposition that the cost be split among the parties seems reasonable, similar to how a mediator’s fee is split. It may be prudent to include a few limitations in the motion: 1) a fee cap, 2) limitations on the expert’s past/current/future business relations with parties/attorneys in the case, and 3) and the expert cannot be a friend or family of the judge. <b><i>5 CFR § 2635.702</i></b><b> Use of public office for private gain. </b></p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">I am against some “qualifications panel” determining who can and can’t be an expert witness and the scope of subject matter of their expertise. You risk unnecessarily tying the court’s hands. Not every expert witness requires a college degree. My law school had a couple of federal judges and a state supreme court justice as adjunct professors; my law school was about a 10 minute drive from their respective courthouses. They often used real life examples in their teaching. One of the examples from a US District Court judge; he allowed a person who dropped out of high school to testify as an expert witness. This may seem counter intuitive – how could a high school dropout be an expert witness???</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">The person had been a ranch hand working on various ranches for 20+ years and was testifying as an expert on the proper standard of care on a ranch. The high school dropout was an expert on the ranch topic. Again, not every expert witness needs a particular degree, it is whatever will help the court in understanding the case. </p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">I believe the US legal system is world class, but the even best can always be improved. Improvements are made by exploring new ideas, such as those proposed by Fred and others.</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,</p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Mark Young, Esq., JD, MBA, BS Civ. Eng.</b></p><p class="MsoNormal">Shareholder, AS-BUILT LAW PLLC</p><p class="MsoNormal">Construction Panel Member, American Arbitration Association</p><p class="MsoNormal">Patent Attorney, U.S. Patent & Trademark Office</p><p class="MsoNormal"><b>Introduction Video:</b> <a href="https://youtu.be/mgszdSuFlKw"><span style="color:#0563c1">https://youtu.be/mgszdSuFlKw</span></a></p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><img border="0" width="149" height="37" style="width:1.5555in;height:.3854in" id="Picture_x0020_14" src="cid:image001.png@01D56CC4.D303A940" alt="AS-BUILT LAW Logo"></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:blue">Concentrating in Construction and Business Law</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:mark.young@asbuiltlaw.com"><span style="color:#0563c1">mark.young@asbuiltlaw.com</span></a></p><p class="MsoNormal">Main: 561-340-3700</p><p class="MsoNormal">Direct: 561-784-2322</p><p class="MsoNormal">Cell: 561-719-1250</p><p class="MsoNormal">West Palm Beach, Florida</p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.asbuiltlaw.com"><span style="color:#0563c1">www.asbuiltlaw.com</span></a></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.asbuiltmed.com"><span style="color:#0563c1">www.asbuiltmed.com</span></a> (AS-BUILT Mediation)</p></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a> <<a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Tony Lehman<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 12, 2019 7:50 AM<br><b>To:</b> Timothy R. Moorhead <<a href="mailto:tmoorhead@wfmblaw.com">tmoorhead@wfmblaw.com</a>>; Fred Barnes <<a href="mailto:fred@fcbarneslaw.com">fred@fcbarneslaw.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:lan@lwwhiteattorney.com">lan@lwwhiteattorney.com</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CLC-Discussion] Informal poll on expert witnesses</p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif">I can understand the idea that juries may ignore expert opinions based on the fact that parties pay the experts. That’s a pretty high level of cynicism, of course, but understandable. Did you ask the jurors what they would have thought of the case if only one side has an expert, though? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif">If the court appoints the expert, the expert essentially becomes a testifying special master. That expert’s opinion will carry such great weight that it will be nearly impossible for the party whose position ends up discarded by the court-appointed expert to overcome. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif">And, I know you say that is sort of the point. But, what if the court-appointed expert is dead wrong about their opinion or makes a mistake and fails to consider certain information that is critical to proper understanding. How, then, does the other side get over the threshold of the imprimatur of “court-appointed” and “neutral” if you cannot offer your own expert to point out the deep flaws in methodology? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif">What happens if the factfinder decides the expert is completely untrustworthy for that particular case? Assume that through brilliant cross-examination you have successfully undermined the testimony of the court’s expert. Where does that leave the case? You still have issues that require expert testimony to decide, yet you now have a factfinder left to its own devices in figuring out what the right answer is. Do you want a jury of twelve people who are not experts just throwing darts to figure out the right answer? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif">How do you define the scope of the court-appointed expert’s area of expertise? If you have multiple issues for different expertise in a case, do you have three or four or five court appointed experts – one for E&O, one for delays, one for what the contractor should have done in the situation, one for what the owner should have done in the situation, etc.? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif">I think your idea is a good one theoretically speaking. In practice, however, I do not think it would work and would strongly oppose it. </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:15.0pt"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p><table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse"><tr><td width="359" style="width:269.25pt;padding:.75pt .75pt 6.0pt .75pt"><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.25pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#7294a4">Anthony D. Lehman</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#878787"><br>Partner</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p></td><td width="292" style="width:219.0pt;padding:0in 0in 6.0pt 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;line-height:15.0pt"><a href="https://www.hpwlegal.com/"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="292" height="45" style="width:3.0416in;height:.4687in" id="_x0000_i1037" src="https://assets-global.website-files.com/5ce2bb097e30fb562a2202b2/5d15584a2771fd29caacf4b9_hpw-logo-292-sigs.png" alt="HudsonParrottWalker, LLC"></span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"></span></p></td></tr><tr><td width="400" colspan="2" style="width:300.0pt;border:none;border-top:solid #7294a4 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Licensed in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:15.0pt"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">Florida Bar Board Certified in Construction Law</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"></span></p></td></tr><tr><td width="359" style="width:269.25pt;padding:7.5pt 7.5pt 6.0pt 7.5pt"><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:14.25pt"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">HudsonParrottWalker, LLC</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">3575 Piedmont Road</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">Suite 850</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">Atlanta, GA 30305</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">t: </span><a href="tel:678-701-2860"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">678-701-2860</span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">m: </span><a href="tel:404-579-9795"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">404-579-9795</span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#2c2c2c">e: </span><a href="mailto:ALehman@HPWlegal.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">ALehman@HPWlegal.com</span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><br><br></span><a href="http://www.hpwlegal.com/" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#7294a4;text-decoration:none">hpwlegal.com</span></b></a><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"></span></p></td><td width="141" style="width:105.75pt;padding:0in 0in 6.0pt 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right;line-height:15.0pt"><a href="https://www.hpwlegal.com/news/hpw-among-the-elite-in-construction-industry-law-firm-rankings" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="200" height="200" style="width:2.0833in;height:2.0833in" id="_x0000_i1036" src="https://assets-global.website-files.com/5ce2bb097e30fb562a2202b2/5d1553892771fd5c11aceb1a_Top50LawLogo_Small.jpg" alt="Banner"></span></a><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"></span></p></td></tr><tr><td width="400" colspan="2" style="width:300.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"></td><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"></td></tr><tr><td width="400" colspan="2" style="width:300.0pt;padding:4.5pt 0in 0in 0in"></td></tr><tr><td width="400" colspan="2" style="width:300.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:15.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p></td></tr><tr><td width="400" colspan="2" style="width:300.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:15.0pt"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#878787">The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future. </span></p></td></tr></table><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Georgia",serif"> </span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a> <<a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Timothy R. Moorhead<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:00 PM<br><b>To:</b> Fred Barnes <<a href="mailto:fred@fcbarneslaw.com">fred@fcbarneslaw.com</a>>; <a href="mailto:lan@lwwhiteattorney.com">lan@lwwhiteattorney.com</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CLC-Discussion] Informal poll on expert witnesses</p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d">Fred,</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d">That is sort of the point.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d">Experts are the only people whose opinions (rather than factual observations) are allowed. See objections relating to hearsay and speculation. However, the idea of parties sponsoring their “expert’s” testimony has led to the fact finder distrusting or ignoring those opinions. They are no longer testifying as “friends of the Court”. They are testifying as “friend of the guy paying me”.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d">So, what I am advocating is finding a process to get back to making expert testimony more trustworthy by the Courts and juries. To do so I think we need a system in place to have the experts prove up their qualifications and be accepted by the Courts and Counsel. Once ”State Certified” if you will, the Court knows they can trust the guidance they give to the Court. The parties can suggest a panel from which the Court chooses and an expert would only be engaged upon the Court’s motion or upon the motion of a party and a showing of cause for their engagement.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d">We pay them from the Court rather than hiring them through counsel. The parties still bear the cost, but less directly.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d"> </span></p><table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="700" style="width:525.0pt"><tr><td style="border:none;border-right:solid darkgray 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:15.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><a href="http://www.wfmblaw.com/"><span style="text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="73" height="78" style="width:.7604in;height:.8125in" id="_x0000_i1035" src="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1e-N9VdqeoECntLnJwfkvVbhKH3f_M7mQ" alt="Wright, Fulford, Moorhead & Brown, P.A."></span></a><span style="color:#1f497d"></span></p></td><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 15.0pt"><table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Timothy R. Moorhead, Esq.</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Board Certified in Construction Law</span></i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">505 Maitland Ave. Suite 1000 | Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 </span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">T: </span><a href="tel:(407)425-0234"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">(407) 425-0234</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> | F: </span><a href="tel:(407)425-0260"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">(407) 425-0260</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"></span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"> </span><a href="mailto:tmoorhead@wfmblaw.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">Email</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> | </span><a href="http://www.wfmblaw.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">Website</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> | </span><a href="http://www.wfmblaw.com/vcard/vcard.php?name_first=Timothy%20R.&name_last=Moorhead"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">vCard</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"></span></p></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 15.0pt"><p class="MsoNormal" style="vertical-align:baseline"><img width="72" height="6" style="width:.75in;height:.0625in" src="cid:image005.png@01D56CC4.D303A940" alt="Martindale-Hubbell"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="vertical-align:baseline"><img width="160" height="37" style="width:1.6666in;height:.3854in" src="cid:image006.png@01D56CC4.D303A940"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"></span></p></td><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" style="padding:3.75pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#888888">This message and its attachments are confidential. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify me immediately. No portion of this message is intended to provide any tax-related advice.</span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#888888"> </span></p></td></tr></table></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#1f497d"> </span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Fred Barnes <<a href="mailto:fred@fcbarneslaw.com">fred@fcbarneslaw.com</a>> <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 11, 2019 6:27 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:lan@lwwhiteattorney.com">lan@lwwhiteattorney.com</a>; Timothy R. Moorhead <<a href="mailto:tmoorhead@wfmblaw.com">tmoorhead@wfmblaw.com</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a><br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [CLC-Discussion] Informal poll on expert witnesses</p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div style="border:solid #9c6500 1.0pt;padding:8.0pt 8.0pt 8.0pt 8.0pt;display:inline-block"><p class="MsoNormal" style="background:#ffeb9c"><b><span style="color:#9c6500">CAUTION:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:black"> This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> </p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Thinking further about the idea, if there is only one expert, and if the expert’s opinions turn out to be in line with one party’s position, how could the other party stand a chance in court? The expert’s opinions would essentially be dispositive of the case? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Frederick C. Barnes, Esq.</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Board Certified Construction Lawyer</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">500 N. Maitland Ave., Suite 305</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Maitland, FL 32751</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">(407) 865-9200</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.fcbarneslaw.com/"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">www.fcbarneslaw.com</span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><img border="0" width="486" height="149" style="width:5.0625in;height:1.552in" id="Picture_x0020_6" src="cid:image007.png@01D56CA3.F9FA7EF0" alt="rsz_1fcb_lrg_logo"></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"> Fred Barnes [</span><a href="mailto:fred@fcbarneslaw.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">mailto:fred@fcbarneslaw.com</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">] <br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 11, 2019 6:16 PM<br><b>To:</b> '<a href="mailto:lan@lwwhiteattorney.com">lan@lwwhiteattorney.com</a>'; 'Timothy R. Moorhead'<br><b>Cc:</b> '<a href="mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org">clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org</a>'<br><b>Subject:</b> RE: [CLC-Discussion] Informal poll on expert witnesses</span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">I also like the idea. It could be a positive and transformative change. I concur that a lot of details would have to be ironed out, not only as to selection of the expert but also, for example, how to determine in advance exactly what facts the expert will be given and exactly what issues on which the expert will be tasked to give opinions. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Is the idea to limit it to construction litigation? How would that be done? Are we talking about statutory or procedural rules changes? Or the creation of a protocol that parties in a constructing dispute could agree to early on in a litigation?</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Frederick C. Barnes, Esq.</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Board Certified Construction Lawyer</span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">500 N. Maitland Ave., Suite 305</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Maitland, FL 32751</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">(407) 865-9200</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.fcbarneslaw.com/"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">www.fcbarneslaw.com</span></a><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><img border="0" width="486" height="149" style="width:5.0625in;height:1.552in" id="Picture_x0020_7" src="cid:image007.png@01D56CA3.F9FA7EF0" alt="rsz_1fcb_lrg_logo"></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"> </span><a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"> [</span><a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">] <b>On Behalf Of </b></span><a href="mailto:lan@lwwhiteattorney.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">lan@lwwhiteattorney.com</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"><br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:02 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'Timothy R. Moorhead'<br><b>Cc:</b> </span><a href="mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CLC-Discussion] Informal poll on expert witnesses</span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Before I respond to the question, please excuse a brief diatribe. Even worse (at least from my perspective) is the situation in arbitrations. I am privileged to serve as a AAA construction and commercial arbitrator, and experts are common. To recite what we all know, experts aren't fact witnesses. They are testifying about their opinions, which can even be based on hearsay which would be in itself inadmissible so long as it is the type of thing on which experts rely. The touchstone for all of this is whether it will assist the trier of fact. You would be disturbed at how often "expert" testimony is so ridiculously overstated the arbitrators wind up almost insulted that anyone thinks they might believe that nonsense. Don't misunderstand. I've been in some cases where the experts were great teachers about the Florida Building Codes, or construction related issues, or other technical issues, and the experts were truly helpful. Unfortunately, I've been in others where the testimony is so obviously biased it is simply a waste of everyone's time.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">End of monologue. To respond to your question, I like the idea. I have one reservation. Because judge's are supposed to be neutral, letting them pick a name unilaterally might be viewed as favoring one side or the other (however inadvertent ). We arbitrators are always painfully aware that one of the few grounds under either the Federal Arbitration Act or the Revised Florida Arbitration Code for vacating an arbitral award is bias. What about a tweak. Have the parties agree on the name, or if they can't, they agree on three names and the trier of fact picks one. If they don't even do that, then the court issues an order describing the expert needed and some third person (the Clerk of the Court?) appoints the expert.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">How does one go about such a rule change?</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828"> </span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Langfred W. White, Esq.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Board Certified in Construction Law</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Fellow of the Construction Lawyers</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Society of America</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#7030a0"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"> </span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"><img border="0" width="91" height="118" style="width:.9479in;height:1.2291in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image008.png@01D56CA3.F9FA7EF0" alt="constructionlaw"></span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"> </span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"><img border="0" width="101" height="101" style="width:1.052in;height:1.052in" id="Picture_x0020_2" src="cid:image009.png@01D56CA3.F9FA7EF0" alt="2019_AAA_logo signature"></span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"> </span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"><img border="0" width="173" height="75" style="width:1.802in;height:.7812in" id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image010.jpg@01D56CA3.F9FA7EF0" alt="CLSA Fellow small"></span></b><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Copperplate Gothic Light",sans-serif;color:#7030a0"></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#7030a0"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Law Offices of Langfred W. White, PA</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">P. O. Box 8334</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Clearwater, FL 33758-8334</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">Phone: (727) 422-5064</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">email: </span><a href="mailto:lan@lwwhiteattorney.com"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">lan@lwwhiteattorney.com</span></a><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#642828"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828">This electronic message is confidential and may be subject to an attorney-client privilege or an attorney work product privilege, or may otherwise be exempt from discovery under applicable federal and state law. It is intended for use only by the named addressee. If you receive this in error or are not the intended recipient, please delete this email and notify the sender via return e-mail or telephone at (727) 422-5064. Pursuant to IRS Circular 230, please be advised this message, and any advice contained in it, is not intended to be used and may not be used to avoid any tax penalties that may be imposed on you.</span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#642828"> </span></p><div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"> </span><a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"> [</span><a href="mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Timothy R. Moorhead<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:16 PM<br><b>To:</b> </span><a href="mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif">clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"><br><b>Subject:</b> [CLC-Discussion] Informal poll on expert witnesses</span></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Question for the group. Please respond only to me to avoid clogging everyone’s email as I have just done.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">The last time I tried a jury trial with expert witnesses, the jurors universally commented that they simply ignored the expert witnesses of both sides. The comment was that they figured that any lawyer could find an expert to say whatever they wanted. Unfortunately, there is probably a lot of truth to that comment. In the olden days when we took notes on stone tablets, we law students were taught that experts testify as a “friend of the court” the idea was that the Court would be in need of some expert guidance.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">So, would there be any support for a rule change that would ban party sponsored experts from testifying?</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Instead, a party would petition the Court to appoint an expert who would then be paid through the Court equally by all parties. The expert would then be testifying as a truly neutral witness. The experts would go through a vetting process to become certified as an expert in any particular field and much like a list of mediators, a list would be available to the Courts. The parties either agree on an expert who is then approached by the Court, or the Court selects its own expert. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">This makes the expert testimony much more reliable and the qualification of the expert has been handled ahead of time. No more Daubert challenges, the Court has predetermined who is and who is not a reliable expert. The Court decides whether to allow the expert to present his testimony or simple advise the Court with regard to any questions the Court may have.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">The Parties would be free to engage their own consulting experts to assist with questioning, etc., but no testimony from them.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Thanks for reading. What do you think? </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"> </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="700" style="width:525.0pt"><tr><td style="border:none;border-right:solid darkgray 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:15.0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><a href="http://www.wfmblaw.com/"><span style="text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="73" height="78" style="width:.7604in;height:.8125in" id="_x0000_i1027" src="https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1e-N9VdqeoECntLnJwfkvVbhKH3f_M7mQ" alt="Wright, Fulford, Moorhead & Brown, P.A."></span></a></p></td><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 15.0pt"><table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Timothy R. Moorhead, Esq.</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Board Certified in Construction Law</span></i><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">505 Maitland Ave. Suite 1000 | Altamonte Springs, FL 32701 </span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">T: </span><a href="tel:(407)425-0234"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">(407) 425-0234</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> | F: </span><a href="tel:(407)425-0260"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">(407) 425-0260</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"></span></p></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"> </span><a href="mailto:tmoorhead@wfmblaw.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">Email</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> | </span><a href="http://www.wfmblaw.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">Website</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> | </span><a href="http://www.wfmblaw.com/vcard/vcard.php?name_first=Timothy%20R.&name_last=Moorhead"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0066cc">vCard</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif"></span></p></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 15.0pt"><p class="MsoNormal" style="vertical-align:baseline"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="vertical-align:baseline"><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black"></span></p></td><td style="padding:0in 0in 0in 0in"></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" style="padding:3.75pt 0in 0in 0in"><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#888888">This message and its attachments are confidential. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please destroy it and notify me immediately. No portion of this message is intended to provide any tax-related advice.</span><span style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#888888"> </span></p></td></tr></table><p class="MsoNormal"> </p></div></div></body></html>