[CLC-Discussion] Construction contracting arrangement

[RPPTL CLC-Discussion]

Good afternoon,

Does anyone have insight regarding certain licensing issues (described below) arising from the following potential contracting arrangement:

·         The owner (who is not a licensed entity) of a multi-family residential property would enter into a contract with a construction management company (a licensed general contractor), whereby the general contractor would oversee/supervise various aspects of construction, including management activities related to subcontractors.

·         However, the owner-not the general contractor-would enter into the underlying subcontracts with various subcontractors, where the scopes of work of many of these subcontractors would require a license (electrical, plumbing, etc.)

I think it is clear that construction management activities would require a license, but I am wondering whether Owner's "contracting" with the subcontractors directly might sufficiently trigger the following licensing exemptions under chapter 489: either (1) the "Big Boy" exemption under section 489.119(7) or (2) the "Developer" exemption under §489.105(6) (I borrow the above "Big Boy" and "Developer" descriptions from Mr. Klingen's informative article from the Florida Bar website<https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/licensing-of-florida-contractors/>).  I think that the two above exemptions may be subject to a few of the following issues under the above potential contracting arrangement:


1)      With respect to the "Big Boy" exemption, the main issue would appear to be whether the construction manager would qualify under the "employ" language of the statute.  In other words, does this provision require that the licensed individual (company?) be employed as W-2 employee as opposed to an independent contractor-or borrowing from chapter 489's definition of "employee", must be "a person who receives compensation from and is under the supervision and control of an employer who regularly deducts the F.I.C.A. and withholding tax and provides workers' compensation, all as prescribed by law."?


2)      With respect to the "Developer" exemption under §489.105(6), the main issue would appear to be whether this exemption could apply to the owner and subcontractor subcontract, or if that exemption is limited to contracts that involves the selling the completed residences.

Any help/guidance you may have would be greatly.  Appreciated; thank you!

Johnathan Ayers, Esq.
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler
Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
Miami, FL 33130
Direct:  305-789-3517
Email:  jayers at stearnsweaver.com<mailto:jayers at stearnsweaver.com>
www.stearnsweaver.com<http://www.stearnsweaver.com/>

Certified by the Florida Bar in Construction Law


________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this E-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20221004/a79102be/attachment.html>