[CLC-Discussion] Warning on Claim of Lien

RPPTL CLC-Discussion clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Mon Feb 14 08:26:40 PST 2022


I’m not aware of any cases in a lien scenario, but there are at least two cases invalidating liens because the NTO lacked the statutory warning language.  The statutes are similarly worded, so that would be my argument.


Lee A. Weintraub
Shareholder
Board Certified in Construction Law
Chair, Public Private Partnerships Practice Group
Vice Chair, Construction Law and Litigation Practice Group
Becker & Poliakoff
1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1800
Ft. Lauderdale, 
FL 
33301
954.985.4147
954.985.4176
lweintraub at beckerlawyers.com
www.beckerlawyers.com
Connect with me on LinkedIn
Follow me on Twitter
Follow Becker on...
Confidentiality Note: This message, together with any attachments, may contain privileged and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any examination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and permanently delete the original message, along with any attachments. Thank you.
​
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of RPPTL CLC-Discussion
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 11:24 AM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Warning on Claim of Lien

EXTERNAL EMAIL - This message originated from an External Source.

Good morning Paul,
It is a statuory requirement, see below. I haven’t seen an opinion negating the lien but I wouldn’t think the issue would make it to an appeals court. Maybe there is a trial court order out there but I am not aware of it.

“The claim of lien shall be sufficient if it is in substantially the following form, and includes the following warning: “ § 713.08(3), Fla. Stat. Ann.

Thanks,
Jack

[cid:image001.gif at 01D82195.BB0E2620]
Jack Taylor | Attorney
Direct Line: (321) 204-4012

Angius & Terry LLP<http://angius-terry.com/>
Ft. Lauderdale      |      Orlando      |      Palm Harbor
(954) 839-6200           (407) 624-3070          (727) 474-0200
www.constructiondefectlaw.com<../../../../../rbennett/Desktop/_Email%20Sig/www.constructiondefectlaw.com>

Check out our new and improved website at constructiondefectlaw.com<http://constructiondefectlaw.com/>! Don’t forget to like us on social media!  [Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/angiusandterry/>  [youtube] <https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnWtPz90yUDN9m6uagSG23OSZDdeCBgBz>  [A close up of a sign  Description automatically generated] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/angius-terry-llp-fl/>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This communication contains information which (a) may be legally privileged, proprietary in nature, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure, and (b) is intended only for the use of the addressee/s named. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee/s, you are hereby notified that reading, copying, or distributing this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by calling (800) 680-4001. Thank you.

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> <clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>> On Behalf Of RPPTL CLC-Discussion
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 10:18 AM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Warning on Claim of Lien

Good morning.

Has anyone seen any court rulings that invalidated a Claim of Lien for not having the "WARNING" language on it?  I have not seen any that finds there was prejudice or bring adversely affected for that language or the required language in the contract for the Construction Lien law notice.

Similarly, I had not seen a Claim of Lien without the WARNING for awhile and have just run across one.

Curious what is being seen out there.

Paul

Paul S. Martin, Esq.
Law Offices of
Paul S. Martin & Associates, P.A.
2134 Hollywood Boulevard
Hollywood, FL  33020
USA

Phone 954.923.4604
Telefax 954.923.6545
___________________________

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is directed.  The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged, confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think that you have received this E-mail message in error, please immediately reply to the sender.


Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here<http://www.mimecast.com/products>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 2952 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1200 bytes
Desc: image002.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image002-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1260 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1229 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image044317.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4010 bytes
Desc: image044317.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image044317-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image806042.png
Type: image/png
Size: 570 bytes
Desc: image806042.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image806042-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image563053.png
Type: image/png
Size: 625 bytes
Desc: image563053.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image563053-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image314661.png
Type: image/png
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: image314661.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image314661-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image714754.png
Type: image/png
Size: 773 bytes
Desc: image714754.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image714754-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image099917.png
Type: image/png
Size: 648 bytes
Desc: image099917.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image099917-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image141897.png
Type: image/png
Size: 727 bytes
Desc: image141897.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image141897-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image534710.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 22516 bytes
Desc: image534710.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image534710-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image254198.png
Type: image/png
Size: 641 bytes
Desc: image254198.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image254198-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image990453.png
Type: image/png
Size: 642 bytes
Desc: image990453.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image990453-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image474313.png
Type: image/png
Size: 675 bytes
Desc: image474313.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image474313-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image822248.png
Type: image/png
Size: 611 bytes
Desc: image822248.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220214/86fff81a/image822248-0001.png>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list