[CLC-Discussion] Evidence question for unlicensed contractor

[RPPTL CLC-Discussion]

Or, get an affidavit from someone who has searched the database.  That’s how prosecutors do it, have a building department official aver that he or she has searched the database.

b.

Brian F. Stayton
Stayton Law Group, P.A.
3619 Lithia Pinecrest Road
Valrico Florida 33596
Telephone: (813) 662-9829
Facsimile: (813) 662-9830
Brian at StaytonLawGroup.com
Board Certified in Construction Law

[signature_1623437274]
NOTICE:  This e-mail was sent by an attorney, is highly confidential, and may be privileged as a matter of law. This message is intended only for the use of persons named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this message, including its dissemination, distribution, copying, or printing, is strictly prohibited. This e-mail and any attached documents contain information that is proprietary, confidential, and protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, as well as Federal and State copyright laws. If you receive this message in error, please reply and inform me of that mistake. In addition, permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.



From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> on behalf of RPPTL CLC-Discussion <clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Date: Monday, June 21, 2021 at 4:02 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org <clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Evidence question for unlicensed contractor
Hi all:

I have a small matter and looking for a cost effective way to establish a non-party is not a licensed contractor even though he claims to be.  I’m thinking judicial notice of the DBPR license search web-site print out under 90.202(12) Facts that are not subject to dispute because they are capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be questioned.

Thank you for any comments or suggestions.

Best regards,

Daniel Greene
Daniel M. Greene, P.A.
Florida Board Certified in Construction Law
Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil and Appellate Mediator
P.O. Box 3092
Orlando, FL 32802-3092
407-448-5391
www.dangreenelaw.com
dan at dangreenelaw.com
dangreenelaw at gmail.com

To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35), we inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.
___________
NOTE: This e-mail is from Daniel M. Greene, P.A., and is intended for the recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to Daniel M. Greene, P.A. that you expect to be confidential. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20210621/c74cc13f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001[14].png
Type: image/png
Size: 350256 bytes
Desc: image001[14].png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20210621/c74cc13f/image00114-0001.png>