[CLC-Discussion] unlicensed contracting question

Gibbons, Michael Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com
Fri Jun 19 12:23:14 PDT 2020


I have not recently researched caselaw on the issue but my interpretation of Fla. Stat. s.489.128(1)(a) is that if a state license is not required for the scope of work at issue, then a contractor/subcontractor cannot be found to be unlicensed under Fla. Stat. s 489.128 (and therefore suffer loss of legal and equitable rights relating to the contract).  On flip side, the fact that a contractor may have a local issued license (but not a state issued license) will not help that contractor avoid 489.128 issues if the scope of work at issue requires a state issued license under Ch. 489.

Michael Gibbons
Shareholder
215 N. Eola Dr. | Orlando, FL 32801
D: 407.418.6378 | P: 407.843.4600
Email<mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com> | Website<http://lowndes-law.com> | Bio<lowndes-law.com/people/Michael-Gibbons> | VCard<https://lowndeslaw.dpmlocal.com/admin/vcard/generate.php?id=64>



[cid:image001.png at 01D6464D.8C10B6A0]

LOCAL ROOTS. BROAD REACH. SM


From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of Daniel Greene
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 3:00 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] unlicensed contracting question

CAUTION: THIS IS AN EXTERNAL EMAIL

Can anyone point me to a case or some authority discussing a contractor being licensed by a local authority (county/city) but not a state license under ch 489?

Thank you for your help.

Best regards,

Daniel Greene
Daniel M. Greene, P.A.
Florida Board Certified in Construction Law
Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil and Appellate Mediator
P.O. Box 3092
Orlando, FL 32802-3092
407-448-5391
www.dangreenelaw.com<http://www.dangreenelaw.com>
dan at dangreenelaw.com<mailto:dan at dangreenelaw.com>
dangreenelaw at gmail.com<mailto:dangreenelaw at gmail.com>

To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35), we inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.
___________
NOTE: This e-mail is from Daniel M. Greene, P.A., and is intended for the recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to Daniel M. Greene, P.A. that you expect to be confidential. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.  For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20200619/ad22984c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3776 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20200619/ad22984c/image001.png>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list