[CLC-Discussion] Lien on a Mobile Home itself

[Willis, David]

Sometimes mobile homes are considered part of the real estate and sometimes mobile homes are treated as vehicles/personalty.  It has been a long time since I had to sort that out.  It depends on a number of factors.



David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation

[http://www.rumberger.com/90F6E0/Signature/RKCLogo.jpg]<http://www.rumberger.com>


Direct: 407.839.2186
Main: 407.872.7300
Cell: 407.497.9174
Email: dwillis at rumberger.com
vCard<http://www.rumberger.com/90F6E0/assets/files/vcards/David%20Willis.vcf>

[vCard]<http://www.rumberger.com/90F6E0/assets/files/vcards/David%20Willis.vcf>[LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/rumberger-kirk-&-caldwell>[Twitter]<https://twitter.com/rumbergerkirk>[Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/rumbergerkirkcaldwell>[Orlando Office]<https://goo.gl/maps/637GK>


________________________________
300 South Orange Avenue | Suite 1400 | Orlando, FL 32801
Mail To: P.O. Box 1873 | Orlando, FL 32802-1873



The information in this e-mail message is legally privileged and confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete from any device/media where the message is stored.
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Greg Elliott
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 4:20 PM
To: Greg Elliott; Michael D. Randolph
Cc: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Lien on a Mobile Home itself

Actually the more specific process for enforcement is at chapter 559 part ix. The definition of motor vehicle includes mobile homes and travel trailers.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 9, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Greg Elliott <gelliott at elliott-berger.com<mailto:gelliott at elliott-berger.com>> wrote:
i.e., Chapter 713, Part II


Gregory T. Elliott
ELLIOTT - BERGER, P. A.
10225 Ulmerton Road, Suite 4A
Largo, Florida 33771
(727) 360-2600 (Phone)
(727) 360-6588 (Fax)
Confidentiality Disclaimer: This email message and any attachments are private communications sent by a law firm, Elliott - Berger, P.A., and may contain confidential or legally privileged information meant solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, then delete the email and any attachments from your system. Thank you.


Disclaimer regarding Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("UETA") (Florida Statutes, Section 668.50):  If this communication concerns negotiation of a contract or agreement, UETA does not apply to this communication.  Contract formation in this matter shall occur only with manually-affixed original signatures on approved, original documents.



NOTE: The Florida Bar Disciplinary Counsel requires all lawyers to notify all recipients of e-mail that (1) e-mail communication is not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it goes from me to you and vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our communications may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us which the e-mail passed through. If you want future communications to be sent in a different fashion, please let me know.



------ Original Message ------
From: "Michael D. Randolph" <Michael.Randolph at gray-robinson.com<mailto:Michael.Randolph at gray-robinson.com>>
To: "Greg Elliott" <gelliott at elliott-berger.com<mailto:gelliott at elliott-berger.com>>
Cc: "Tom McKeel" <jtm at mckeellaw.com<mailto:jtm at mckeellaw.com>>; "clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>" <clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>>
Sent: 6/9/2016 2:48:19 PM
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Lien on a Mobile Home itself

But you can file a mechanics lien against the title...

Sent from my iPad


Michael D. Randolph | Shareholder
G R A Y | R O B I N S O N

1404 Dean Street, Suite 300 | Fort Myers, Florida 33901
T: 239-552-4810 | F: 239-598-3164 | D: 239-552-4810


8889 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 400 | Naples, Florida 34108
T: 239-598-3601 | F: 239-598-3164
E-mail<mailto:Michael.Randolph at gray-robinson.com> | Website<http://www.gray-robinson.com/> | Bio<http://www.gray-robinson.com/attorneys/detail/1007/MichaelD-Randolph> | vCard<http://www.gray-robinson.com/docs/Michael%20Randolph.vcf>

Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/GrayRobinsonLaw> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/grayrobinson-p-a-> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/grayrobinsonlaw>

This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
On Jun 9, 2016, at 2:36 PM, Greg Elliott <gelliott at elliott-berger.com<mailto:gelliott at elliott-berger.com>> wrote:
My recollection is that you cannot lien motor vehicles or mobile homes under part I of chapter 713.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 9, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Tom McKeel <jtm at mckeellaw.com<mailto:jtm at mckeellaw.com>> wrote:
I would be interested in any advice you receive.


J. Thomas McKeel, P.A.
J. Thomas McKeel, Esq.
jtm at mckeellaw.com<mailto:jtm at mckeellaw.com>
303 Centre Street Suite 103
Fernandina Beach, Florida 32034
904-261-9437


________________________________
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Michelle L. Rivera
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 1:45 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Lien on a Mobile Home itself
Good afternoon and pardon the interruption,

A contractor has recorded a claim of lien for work performed on a mobile home. The mobile home is owned by an individual but on leased land in a mobile home park. I am aware of Section 713.10(2)(b)(3), Florida Statutes which indicates the lien will not attach to the land. However, my question is will the lien attach still attach to the mobile home (personal property)? The mobile home owner still has a certificate of title (with no finance company lien holder) to the mobile home.

If anyone has any insight on this topic, please reply directly to the sender. Thank you in advance for any information.

Kind regards,

Michelle L. Rivera, Esq.
 Attorney




<image001.png>

Williams Law Firm
2273 Lee Road, Suite 200
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Telephone: 407-926-4100

Michelle at WCLfirm.com<mailto:gtwlaw at ymail.com>
www.WCLFirm.com<http://www.williamsconstructionlaw.com/>

<image002.jpg>




This email message including attachments, if any, is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain attorney-client confidential and/or privileged information.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email message in error, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message including attachments.  Thank you.
Pursuant to federal regulations imposed on practitioners who render tax advice ("Circular 230"), we are required to advise you that any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.  If this advice is or is intended to be used or referred to in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement, the regulations under Circular 230 require that we advise you as follows: (1) this writing is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on a taxpayer; (2) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed by the written advice; and (3) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.




_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160609/99c632f3/attachment-0001.html>