[CLC-Discussion] Lien rights for non-conforming goods?

Brad R. Weiss brad at bmwlawyers.net
Tue Aug 9 11:12:43 PDT 2016


This was one of the issues discussed during the CLI presentation on fixing what’s wrong with the lien law.  The language “in accordance with” in 713.06(1) is the problem, as it does not specify whether it’s scope, specs, terms, or all of them, and surprisingly no cases exist on point.   This should be clarified.

Brad R. Weiss, Esq.|BENSON, MUCCI & WEISS PL
Florida Bar Board Certified Construction Lawyer
5561 University Drive, Suite 102
Coral Springs FL 33067
Phone 954.323.1023| Direct 754.224.4811
brad at bmwlawyers.net<http://@bmwlawyers.net> | www.bmwlawyers.net<http://www.bmwlawyers.net/>

[Description: Description: ConstructionLaw]    [cid:image002.png at 01D1F248.EF399330]  [member_logo_6.5]

The information contained in this electronic e-mail message is privileged and confidential.  It is intended for the use by the named recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at 954-323-1023.  Thank you.

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Ed Kinberg
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 2:03 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; 'Gibbons, Michael'; 'Randall Gilbert'; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Lien rights for non-conforming goods?

I agree with Reese.  If the manufacturer had not role in the error, i.e. they were made to the requested spec, it will have lien rights.




[http://uslegalteam.com/WMLOGO.png]<http://uslegalteam.com>


Ed Kinberg, Attorney at Law
1990 W New Haven Ave Ste. 201
Melbourne, Florida 32904
(321) 255-2332   (321) 255-2351

[https://zwmlegal.com/emailsig/pri.jpg]<http://www.primerus.com/law-firms/widerman-malek-melbourne-florida-fl.htm?params=zies-widerman-malek-melbourne-florida-fl.htm>








NOTICE: This message and any attachments are solely for the use of the intended recipient. They may contain privileged and/or confidential information, attorney work product, or other information protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you received this email in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please contact Widerman Malek at the above-referenced number, and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Thank you.





From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:36 PM
To: 'Gibbons, Michael' <Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com>>; 'Randall Gilbert' <rgilbert at theconstructionlawyers.com<mailto:rgilbert at theconstructionlawyers.com>>; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Lien rights for non-conforming goods?

My friend Michael is incorrect.  See § 713.01(13); see also Aquatic Plant Management, Inc. v. Paramount Engineering, Inc., 977 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).  Assuming, of course, the windows really were specially fabricated for this project.


Reese J. Henderson, Jr. | Shareholder
Florida Bar Board Certified in Construction Law
Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator
G R A Y | R O B I N S O N

50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100 | Jacksonville, Florida 32202
T: 904-598-9929 | F: 904-598-9109 | D: 904-632-8459
E-mail<mailto:Reese.Henderson at gray-robinson.com> | Website<http://www.gray-robinson.com> | Bio<http://www.gray-robinson.com/attorneys/detail/1022/ReeseJ-HendersonJr> | vCard<http://www.gray-robinson.com/docs/Reese%20Henderson.vcf>

Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/GrayRobinsonLaw> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/grayrobinson-p-a-> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/grayrobinsonlaw>


This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.

Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Gibbons, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:19 PM
To: 'Randall Gilbert'; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Lien rights for non-conforming goods?


Per 713.06(1), the answer appears to be “no”.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons>)
Shareholder
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 N. Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: 407-418-6378
Fax: 407-843-4444
email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
website: http://www.lowndes-law.com<http://www.lowndes-law.com/>

        [cid:image010.jpg at 01D1F248.964A8BD0]

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Randall Gilbert
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 12:11 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Lien rights for non-conforming goods?


1.    OWNER contracts with GC for installation of Windows.

2.    GC orders windows from MANUFACTURER/MATERIALMAN.

3.    MANUFACTURER specially fabricates Windows and delivers same to OWNER’S house.

4.    Assume the windows are manufactured exactly how the GC ordered them, but that the GC provided incorrect specifications to the MANUFACTURER.

5.    Upon delivery, OWNER fires GC.

6.    OWNER further advises MANUFACTURER that the windows are all the wrong dimensions and wrong energy ratings (in other words non-conforming goods that do not conform with the plans).

7.    The Windows have not been installed.

8.    Based on the above facts, does the MANUFACTURER/MATERIALMAN have lien rights against the OWNER for non-conforming goods?


Sincerely yours,

Address:    1720 Harrison Street, Penthouse B


                   Hollywood, FL 33020



Office:       (954) 620-5000


Fax:           (954) 620-5105



Web#1:      www.TheConstructionLawyers.com<http://www.theconstructionlawyers.com/>

Randall Gilbert, Esq.

Web#2:      www.TheTitleLawyers.com<http://www.thetitlelawyers.com/>

Board Certified Construction Lawyer

Web#3:      www.TheCorporateLawyers.com<http://www.thecorporatelawyers.com/>

[Randall Gilbert][cid:image003.gif at 01CD3F4A.EF94F960]



Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction, re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.

Cloud Storage: The firm discourages the use of 3rd party cloud storage services for client confidential information because we are unable to confirm that such services provide adequate security. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should a client direct the firm to utilize a cloud storage service, the firm shall not be responsible for any harm occasioned by the disclosure of confidential information occurring as a consequence thereof.

[v4.30]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image010.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2848 bytes
Desc: image010.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/image010-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image011.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14600 bytes
Desc: image011.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/image011-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image012.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 4337 bytes
Desc: image012.gif
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/image012-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3679 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11365 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3883 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20160809/84e23393/image003-0001.jpg>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list