[CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

Tue Dec 22 13:42:10 PST 2015

Interesting history, Robert; I didn’t know you served on CILB. Perhaps you should compile a history of the CILB, pre-move to Tallahassee (which I recall took several years from 1996-1998??)

Fred R. Dudley, Partner
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
Dudley, Sellers & Healy, P. L.
SunTrust Financial Center, Suite 301
3522 Thomasville Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Cell: (850) 294-3471
Direct: (850)692-6368
dudley at mylicenselaw.com

From: Robert Worman [mailto:rworman at wormanlaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:15 PM
To: Fred Dudley <dudley at mylicenselaw.com>; Gibbons, Michael <Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com>; 'Roberts, Hardy L.' <HRoberts at cfjblaw.com>; 'Barry Kalmanson' <bkpa1 at aol.com>; JVento at trenam.com; rsutton at raileyharding.com; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: RE: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

“Common Man (Fred)”-Jax was great!  Tell’m Reese. We all knew and looked to Milt Rubin (may he rest in peace) who you could always count on to come up with the right answer and then had the power as the #1GS employee to tell the Executive Director and Board members (including me) that was the way it would be.

Regards,

Robert B. Worman
Worman & Sheffler, P.A.
2707 West Fairbanks Avenue
Suite 200
Winter Park, FL 32789
407 843-5353
rworman at wormanlaw.com<mailto:rworman at wormanlaw.com>
NOTICE:
THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENT TO THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT MAY BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED.  IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU MUST NOT REVIEW, RETRANSMIT, CONVERT TO HARD COPY, COPY, USE OR DISSEMINATE THIS E-MAIL OR ANY ATTACHMENT TO IT. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY RETURN E-MAIL OR BY TELEPHONE AT 407-843-5353 AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE.  PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE CONTAINS A FORWARDED MESSAGE OR IS A REPLY TO A PRIOR MESSAGE, SOME OR ALL OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS MESSAGE OR ANY ATTACHMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN PRODUCED BY WORMAN & SHEFFLER, P.A.
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE:  TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY THE IRS UNDER CIRCULAR 230, WE INFORM YOU THAT ANY U.S. FEDERAL TAX ADVICE CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION (INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS), UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY STATED, WAS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, FOR THE PURPOSES OF (1) AVOIDING PENALTIES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OR (2) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
PLEASE BE ADVISED THIS LAW FIRM MAY BE ACTING AS A DEBT COLLECTOR AND IS ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT A DEBT.  ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE.

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Fred Dudley
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 3:03 PM
To: Gibbons, Michael <Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com>>; 'Roberts, Hardy L.' <HRoberts at cfjblaw.com<mailto:HRoberts at cfjblaw.com>>; 'Barry Kalmanson' <bkpa1 at aol.com<mailto:bkpa1 at aol.com>>; JVento at trenam.com<mailto:JVento at trenam.com>; rsutton at raileyharding.com<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com>; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

Awwww, Jacksonville: I remember it well….depos, subpoenas….thank goodness CILB is in Tallahassee for the past (almost) 20 years now.

Fred R. Dudley, Partner
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
Dudley, Sellers & Healy, P. L.
SunTrust Financial Center, Suite 301
3522 Thomasville Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Cell: (850) 294-3471
Direct: (850)692-6368
dudley at mylicenselaw.com<mailto:dudley at mylicenselaw.com>

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Gibbons, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 2:26 PM
To: 'Roberts, Hardy L.' <HRoberts at cfjblaw.com<mailto:HRoberts at cfjblaw.com>>; 'Barry Kalmanson' <bkpa1 at aol.com<mailto:bkpa1 at aol.com>>; JVento at trenam.com<mailto:JVento at trenam.com>; rsutton at raileyharding.com<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com>; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

  Thanks Hardy.  You provide a creative and nuanced argument for non-licensure but I am not convinced the argument can be squared with the plain terms of the statute cited earlier.  I assign little to no weight to the opinion of the DBPR Call Center rep who fielded the call.  Years ago, when the CILB in Jax  was responding directly to such calls, there was a voice or two in that office who was fairly authoritative and knowledgeable and whose opinion on licensure carried weight.  That is not the case with the Call Center operators in Tallahassee.

   I continue to believe that if it was important enough for the Legislature to say that CGC’s and underground contractors may perform site work on any site in the State while CBCs and CRCs are limited to lots where a building is located, then that cannot mean that anyone (without regard to state licensure) including a CBC and CRC can contract for site improvements on all sites in the State including on  lots where there is no building.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons>)
Shareholder
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 N. Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: 407-418-6378
Fax: 407-843-4444
email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
website: http://www.lowndes-law.com<http://www.lowndes-law.com/>

        [cid:image001.jpg at 01D13CD7.B06F3B90]

From: Roberts, Hardy L. [mailto:HRoberts at cfjblaw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:53 PM
To: Gibbons, Michael; 'Barry Kalmanson'; JVento at trenam.com<mailto:JVento at trenam.com>; rsutton at raileyharding.com<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com>; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: RE: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

I think the definition of “contracting,” which turns on the definition of “contractor,” supports the informal no license required response Bo received.

If the work is not related to a building or structure, then I think it’s hard to say that state licensure (i.e. a license under Chapter 489) is required.  Chapter 489 requires construction licenses for work that includes related improvements to real estate:

489.105(3) “Contractor” means the person who is qualified for, and is only responsible for, the project contracted for and means, except as exempted in this part, the person who, for compensation, undertakes to, submits a bid to, or does himself or herself or by others construct, repair, alter, remodel, add to, demolish, subtract from, or improve any building or structure, including related improvements to real estate, for others or for resale to others; and whose job scope is substantially similar to the job scope described in one of the paragraphs of this subsection. . . . .

489.105(6) (6) “Contracting” means, except as exempted in this part, engaging in business as a contractor and includes, but is not limited to, performance of any of the acts as set forth in subsection (3) which define types of contractors. . . .

If the real estate improvements relate to contractor work that would otherwise require a license, then I think the appropriate CGC, CBC, CRC or certified underground utility and excavation license would be required.

Perhaps a way to reconcile the Section 489.113(3)(a) language is to look at that language in light of potential local licensure requirements. Hence, if you had the state license, the Section 489.113(3)(a) language suggests state law preempts additional local licensing requirements. For example, CGCs or certified underground utility and excavation contractors could do site work regardless of whether it is related to a building and regardless of local requirements because the statute says “any construction project.” On the other hand, CBCs and CRC’s could only be exempt from local requirements with respect to the lot where the building is located. Under that reading, no state license is required for CBCs or CRCs to do unrelated site work, but they would still need to meet local license requirements.

Hardy

[Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.]
Hardy L. Roberts
Shareholder
Direct: 813.229.4105 | Cell: 813.966.9511

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Gibbons, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:51 PM
To: 'Barry Kalmanson'; JVento at trenam.com<mailto:JVento at trenam.com>; rsutton at raileyharding.com<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com>; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

Thanks Barry. Regrettably, the 2015 language does not resolve the question when the Div. 1 contractor is only licensed as a CBC or CRC.  The statute says “provided the work is within the scope of the supervising contractor’s license”, then the unlicensed contractor may perform the construction work (in this case site work).  But that language doesn’t address the basic question, which is may a CBC or CRC license holder perform clearing, grubbing and earthwork on a lot on which a building Is NOT located?

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons>)
Shareholder
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 N. Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: 407-418-6378
Fax: 407-843-4444
email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
website: http://www.lowndes-law.com<http://www.lowndes-law.com/>

        [cid:image001.jpg at 01D13CD7.B06F3B90]

From: Barry Kalmanson [mailto:bkpa1 at aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:44 PM
To: JVento at trenam.com<mailto:JVento at trenam.com>; Gibbons, Michael; rsutton at raileyharding.com<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com>; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

You may want to look at the recent change to Section 489.113(2) Florida Statutes. If the scope of work is being performed by a subcontractor for a licensed Division 1 contractor a license is NOT  required.

Sincerely,

Barry Kalmanson
500 N Maitland Avenue
Suite 305
Maitland, Fl. 32751
407-645-4500 x 215

-----Original Message-----
From: John S. Vento <JVento at trenam.com<mailto:JVento at trenam.com>>
To: 'Gibbons, Michael' <Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com>>; 'Rouselle \Bo\. Sutton III' <rsutton at raileyharding.com<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com>>; 'clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org' <clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>>
Sent: Tue, Dec 22, 2015 12:22 pm
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question
I agree with Mike. The language in the statute would be otherwise superfluous.

[Trenam Law]

JOHN S. VENTO | ATTORNEY
Florida Bar Board Certified in Construction Law
Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil Mediator
Dir: 813-227-7483 | Cell: 813-787-5579 | Fax: 813-227-0483 | email<mailto:JVento at trenam.com> | vcard<http://www.trenam.com/documents/John%20S.%20Vento.vcf> | bio<http://www.trenam.com/profiles_listall.asp?profileID=4>

101 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 2700, Tampa, FL 33602
Main: 813-223-7474 | www.trenam.com<http://www.trenam.com>

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail, or by telephone at the direct dial number above and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you.

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org?>] On Behalf Of Gibbons, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:52 AM
To: 'Rouselle "Bo". Sutton III'; 'clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>'
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

  This is an interesting area of the state’s licensure law that has always raised questions for me as well.  The fact that Fla. Stat. s. 489.113 (3)(a) expressly limits a CBC and CRC license holder to performing site work  “limited to the lot on which any specific building is located” has always suggested to me that a state license is required to perform clearing, grubbing, grading and other site work else why the express limitation on the rights of the building and residential contractor?   If no licensure at all from the state was required for these site work activities, then there would be no need for the Legislature to add an express limitation on the rights of certified contractors.

  I have not litigated this issue to conclusion and don’t have any caselaw authority.  It would be a good issue to pose in the form of a question to DBPR for formal resolution but I have not done so.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons>)
Shareholder
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 N. Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: 407-418-6378
Fax: 407-843-4444
email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
website: http://www.lowndes-law.com

        [cid:image001.jpg at 01D13CD7.B06F3B90]

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Rouselle "Bo". Sutton III
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:10 AM
To: 'clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>'
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Site Contractor Licensing Question

I have a question about site work and licensure. Does clearing, grubbing and grading require a specific license? I see that a general contractor and underground utility contractor may perform this work (see statute below), but 489 is not clear whether such a license is required. I have spoken with DBPR, and they gave the unofficial opinion no license is required for clearing, grubbing, grading, importing fill, spreading fill, etc. Does anyone have official experience with this?

489.113 (3)(a) states: “A general, building, or residential contractor, except as otherwise provided in this part, shall be responsible for any construction or alteration of a structural component of a building or structure, and any certified general contractor or certified underground utility and excavation contractor may perform clearing and grubbing, grading, excavation, and other site work for any construction project in the state. Any certified building contractor or certified residential contractor may perform clearing and grubbing, grading, excavation, and other site work for any construction project in this state, limited to the lot on which any specific building is located.”

Rouselle "Bo" Sutton, III
Board Certified, Construction Law
Railey Harding + Allen | PA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
"Recommended Insurance Attorneys" - A.M. Best
“AV Preeminent® Rated Firm” - Martindale-Hubbell
“Tier 1 Florida Law Firm” - U.S. News Best Law Firms

15 North Eola Drive | Orlando, FL 32801
P 407.648.9119  |  F 407.648.8049

website<http://www.raileyharding.com/> | vCard<http://www.raileyharding.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/rouselle_bo_sutton_iii.vcf> | map<https://www.google.com/maps/place/Railey+Harding+%26+Allen+PA/@28.542892,-81.369761,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x88e77ae3758bc137:0x4ae2132385586b9b> | email<mailto:rsutton at raileyharding.com> | linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/in/bosuttoniii>

Confidentiality Notice:  This message may contain confidential information protected by the attorney-client and/or work product privilege.  The information is only for the use of the individual to whom it is intended by the sender to be sent.  If you are not such recipient, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon this email is prohibited.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction, re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.

[v4.30]
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction, re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.

[v4.30]

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction, re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.

[v4.30]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20151222/e5434488/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2848 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20151222/e5434488/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 26949 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20151222/e5434488/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10722 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20151222/e5434488/image003-0001.png>