[CLC-Discussion] Local Licensing

Mon Mar 10 12:37:54 PDT 2014

Also makes you wonder how the sister can qualify the company if she is not a member and not an employee……

[cid:image002.jpg at 01CF3C76.B3FB44B0]

Christopher M. Cobb, Esq.
Board Certified in Construction Law
Jimerson & Cobb, P.A.
Business Litigation | Construction Law | Banking Law | Creditor’s Rights & AR Collection | Community Associations

Telephone: (904) 389-0050 | Facsimile: (904) 212-1269
ccobb at jimersoncobb.com<mailto:ccobb at jimersoncobb.com> | JimersonCobb.com<http://www.jimersoncobb.com/>

Add to Contacts<http://www.jimersoncobb.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Christopher-M-Cobb.vcf> | View Biography<http://www.jimersoncobb.com/attorneys/christopher-m-cobb/>

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of lauriesams at comcast.net
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 3:21 PM
To: Gibbons, Michael; 'White, Patrick G.'; 'Brian Solomon'; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Local Licensing

I believe everyone is way over thinking this. I think the issue is the sister (the one holding the license) does not have a workers comp exemption.   To obtain a workers comp exemption you must own at least 10%. If its a single member LLC, your client would be the one with the exemption.  She does not own any of the LLC, as such she cannot be exempt.  He needs to either have her as a % owner and file for the 2 year exemption or he needs to get it for her.
Laurie B. Sams
Van Winkle & Sams, P.A.
3859 Bee Ridge Road, Suite 202
Sarasota, FL 34233
(941) 923-1685
fax (941) 923-0174
www.vwslaw.com<http://www.vwslaw.com>
Please Note: Our firm only accepts WIRES for closings.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This transmittal may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise
be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received this transmittal in error. In that case, any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is
strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
telephone (941) 923-1685, or e-mail at lauriesams at comcast.net<mailto:lauriesams at comcast.net>  and immediately delete this message and all of its
attachments.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gibbons, Michael<mailto:Michael.Gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
To: 'White, Patrick G.'<mailto:PWhite at porterwright.com> ; 'Brian Solomon'<mailto:bsolomon at solomon-law.com> ; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Local Licensing

Thanks for the statutory cites Patrick.  However, I’m not sure that resolves the issue.  Ch. 489 simply requires the licensed contractor to comply with the WC insurance requirements of Ch. 440.  Ch. 440 meanwhile expressly permits certain principal owned companies to be WC exempt and I am unaware of a provision that eliminates GC’s from taking advantage of this statutory exemption (which seems wrong and was basis for my original post).  Based on the fact that I have encountered several licensed GC’s without WC coverage, I am assuming that DBPR does not require WC coverage as a condition of licensure.  Apparently, DBPR only requires the contractor to comply with Ch. 440 which then allows the very small closely owned contractor to exempt itself from coverage.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons>)
Shareholder
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 N. Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: 407-418-6378
Fax: 407-843-4444
email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
website: http://www.lowndes-law.com<http://www.lowndes-law.com/>

        [cid:image003.jpg at 01CF3C76.B3FB44B0]

From: White, Patrick G. [mailto:PWhite at porterwright.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:17 PM
To: Gibbons, Michael; 'Brian Solomon'; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: RE: Local Licensing

Sounds like Pasco County has it almost right in that they wouldn’t be able to issue a BP, see Secs. 489.113 (4)(c)  489.114, so why grant the license! They wouldn’t here in Collier either-

(c) The local government may also deny issuance of, or may suspend, any outstanding building permit where a contractor fails or refuses to provide proof of public liability and property damage insurance coverage as required by s. 489.115<index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0400-0499/0489/Sections/0489.115.html>(5) and workers’ compensation insurance coverage as required by s. 489.114<index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0400-0499/0489/Sections/0489.114.html>

Patrick G. White | Bio<http://www.porterwright.com/patrick_white/> | Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP<http://www.porterwright.com> | 9132 Strada Place, 3rd Floor | Naples, FL 34108

Direct: 239-593-2963 | Mobile: 239-784-5173 | Fax: 239-593-2990 | Toll Free: 800-876-7962 | pwhite at porterwright.com<mailto:pwhite at porterwright.com>

Florida Bar Board Certified in City, County, and Local Government Law

porterwright

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Gibbons, Michael
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 1:28 PM
To: 'Brian Solomon'; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Local Licensing

I have not.  And sorry for hijacking your post, Brian, but I have occasionally run into the WC exempt GC and it always seemed wrong to me.  The GC is supposed to be the “statutory employer” under Ch. 440 if, as happens, an injured subcontractor employee is not covered by the workers compensation policy of the subcontractor employer.  When the GC itself is exempt, that safety net is lost.  It’s been a while since I read the CILB FAC governing licensing requirements but it used to mandate a minimum amount of GL insurance coverage and compliance with workers compensation insurance coverage requirements.  I realize that some GC entities are small enough to qualify as WC exempt but I’m surprised that neither Ch. 440 nor FAC apparently expressly prohibits a General Contractor from operating without workers compensation coverage.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio<http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons>)
Shareholder
Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
215 N. Eola Drive
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: 407-418-6378
Fax: 407-843-4444
email: michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com<mailto:michael.gibbons at lowndes-law.com>
website: http://www.lowndes-law.com<http://www.lowndes-law.com/>

        [cid:image003.jpg at 01CF3C76.B3FB44B0]

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Brian Solomon
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 12:51 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Local Licensing

My client is a single member LLC with a certificate of workers compensation insurance exemption.  The company is qualified as a general contractor by his sister, who does not work for the company, she only qualifies the company.  Pasco County is refusing to give my client a county license because the qualifier doesn’t have proof of workers compensation insurance.

Has anyone run into this situation?

[email signature 4]

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction, re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230) require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that, unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the) transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein. Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its particular circumstances. [v4.30]

**********Notice from Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP**********
This message may be protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you believe that it has been sent to you in error, do not read, print or forward it. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error. Then delete it. Thank you.

To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that any federal tax advice contained in this message, including attachments, is not a covered opinion as described in Treasury Department Circular 230 and therefore cannot be relied upon to avoid any tax penalties or to support the promotion or marketing of any federal tax transaction.
********************End of Notice********************

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction, re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230) require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that, unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the) transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein. Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its particular circumstances. [v4.30]

________________________________
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140310/e6b77a94/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 48092 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140310/e6b77a94/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1943 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140310/e6b77a94/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2848 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140310/e6b77a94/image003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10754 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140310/e6b77a94/image004.jpg>