[CLC-Discussion] FW: [Locgovtopics] Caution regarding F.S. 119.0701 contract requirements

Bruce Partington bparting at cphlaw.com
Tue Jan 14 11:17:41 PST 2014


 

One of my partners sent me the e-mail below.  This is something that
those of us who represent contractors who contract with governmental
agencies need to be aware of.  

 

 

Bruce D. Partington

Clark Partington

bpartington at cphlaw.com <mailto:bpartington at cphlaw.com> 

Direct: 850-432-1399

Fax: 850-432-7340

*Board Certified in Construction Law

 

NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments are private
communication sent by the law firm of Clark Partington Hart Larry Bond &
Stackhouse, and may contain confidential, legally privileged information
meant solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
Please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and
delete the e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank you.

 

 

From: LocGovTopics [
mailto:locgovtopics-bounces+wdunaway=cphlaw.com at listserve.com] On Behalf
Of Richard A. Harrison
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:10 AM
To: LocGovTopics at listserve.com
Subject: [Locgovtopics] Caution regarding F.S. 119.0701 contract
requirements

 

Most on here are familiar with the newly enacted F.S. 119.0701, which
requires that agency contracts contain specified terms as to a
contractor's obligations under the Public Records Law.

 

Many agencies are now routinely incorporating such requirements into
their contracts, and seemingly doing so without much thought on the
matter.

 

Here is a lurking issue: the statutory definition of "contractor" in
this section is any entity "that enters into a contract for services
with a public agency and is acting on behalf of the public agency as
provided under s. 119.011(2)." Thus, the definition incorporates the
"acting on behalf of" concept, and by extension the well-known Schwab
test for determining who is "acting on behalf of" a public agency. It
would therefore appear to me (and likely to any reviewing court) that an
agency and a contractor signing a contract with these provisions
incorporated have both expressly admitted that the contractor is "acting
on behalf of" the agency under 119.011(2) and Schwab.

 

If both parties do that knowingly, or just don't care (perhaps because
the contractor is plainly "acting on behalf of" the agency under Schwab)
then there's no problem. But if agency contractors in particular aren't
paying attention, then they will be making admissions that they may
later come to regret. And if they are paying attention, then agency
attorneys may soon have to confront objections to the inclusion of such
language in contracts. I can envision a contractor objecting, stating
that it refuses to concede in advance that it is "acting on behalf of"
the agency and therefore subject to the Public Records Law under
119.011(2) and Schwab. In some cases, that position may not be
unreasonable - after all, Schwab is a fact-intensive inquiry. 

 

Just a thought for a Monday morning . . . 

 

How are you dealing with this issue in your agency contracts?  

 

Richard A. Harrison, P.A. Attorneys at Law

 

Richard A. Harrison

Florida Bar No.:  602493

Board Certified by The Florida Bar in City, County & Local Government
Law

400 N. Ashley Drive

Suite 2600

Tampa, FL 33602

rah at harrisonpa.com

Office: 813-712-8757  Ext. 7057

Cell: 813-230-7317

www.harrisonpa.com

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission and any documents
attached to or accompanying this email contain information from the law
firm of Richard A. Harrison, P.A., which is confidential and/or legally
privileged. The information is intended solely for the use of the
individuals or entities to whom this email is intended to be delivered.
Any transmission of confidential and/or legally privileged information
to persons or entities other than the intended recipients, whether
through inadvertence or otherwise, shall not be construed as a waiver of
any legal privilege or confidentiality. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that the opening, review, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or forwarding of this email or its contents or
attachments, or the taking of any action in reliance thereon, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately and permanently delete it and any attachments from your
records and notify us via email so that we may take appropriate
corrective action. Thank you.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140114/f1c604f8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT102367.txt
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140114/f1c604f8/ATT102367.txt>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list