[CLC-Discussion] Unlicensed subcontractor for local license

[Aaron Haak]

Anyone have specific thought or citation to a situation where a contractor held a license at time of contracting but during the course of project through completion and lien filing license was suspended.   Statue talks of  loss of rights to enforce if unlicensed at time of entering contract, but public policy would seem to dictate that intent is for license to be held and active through performance.

Aaron A. Haak
Board Certified Business Litigation Attorney
Board Certified Construction Law Attorney

Knott • Ebelini • Hart
1625 Hendry Street Suite 301<x-apple-data-detectors://0>
Fort Myers, Florida 33901<x-apple-data-detectors://0>

239-334-2722<tel:239-334-2722> telephone
239-334-1446<tel:239-334-1446> facsimile

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail along with any attachments transmitted with it, is for the sole use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, retention, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail is not addressed to you (or if you have any reason to believe that it is not intended to for you), please notify Knott Ebelini Hart or the sender by telephone at (239)334-2722<tel:(239)334-2722> or by return e-mail and promptly destroy all copies of the transmission.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE:  Pursuant to Treasury Department Circular 230, this is to advise you unless we otherwise expressly state in writing, e-mail communications, including all attachments,  from this firm are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties.  If you wish to engage this firm to provide formal written advice as to federal or state tax issues, please contact the sender.



On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:24 PM, "Roberts, Hardy L." <hroberts at carltonfields.com<mailto:hroberts at carltonfields.com>> wrote:

Unlicensed contracting is a crime.  I'm not sure what impact that has on the homeowner's claimed liability, but it is worth considering.

On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:29 PM, "Richard A. Burt" <dick at burt-burt.com<mailto:dick at burt-burt.com><mailto:dick at burt-burt.com>> wrote:

The contractor is suing in tort, not contract.

Neither FS 489.128 (dealing with enforceability of a contract for construction), nor the (oral) contract (which does not address/allocate liability for personal injury), nor case law (see Tiara) bars a tort claim arising out of an injury.  Subject to workers compensation statutes (of which I know nothing), in my opinion, the tort claim survives even though a contract claim would be barred.

The duty issue might depend upon the homeowner’s relationship with the claimant: is the claimant an ‘employee’ or an ‘independent contractor’?


From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org><mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Sean A. Mickley
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:11 PM
To: 'Sakwa, Stuart H.'; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org><mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Unlicensed subcontractor for local license

Dovetailing off Mr. Sakwa’s post…

Homeowner hires an unlicensed contractor/handyman to perform remedial work, including roofing repair work. The unlicensed contractor/handyman does not have safety fall protection while performing the roofing repair work, falls off the Homeowner’s roof, lands on his feet and breaks his foot. The unlicensed contractor/handyman now sues the Homeowner for negligence asserting, among other things, that the Homeowner owed the unlicensed contractor/handyman a duty to supervise his work and provide safety fall protection.

Questions:


1.       Is such a negligence claim arguably barred because he is an unlicensed contractor? If not, can his failure to be licensed under ch. 489, F.S. serve as evidence of negligence for purposes of comparative negligence?

2.       As a threshold issue, does a Homeowner owe an unlicensed contractor/handyman a duty to supervise his work and/or provide fall protection?

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks.


<image001.jpg>

Sean A. Mickley, Esq.


Gould Cooksey Fennell

979 Beachland Boulevard

Vero Beach, FL 32963

Telephone  772-231-1100      Fax 772-231-2020

smickley at gouldcooksey.com<mailto:smickley at gouldcooksey.com><mailto:smickley at gouldcooksey.com>

The information contained in this transmission is attorney privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you received this communication in error and then delete it. Thank you.


Circular 230 Disclosure: In compliance with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to IRS Circular 230, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.




From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org><mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Sakwa, Stuart H.
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:07 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org><mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Unlicensed subcontractor for local license

Is anyone aware of a case that holds that a subcontractor who does not have a certificate of competency for a specialty trade that is required by a county ordinance, but not 489, is barred from enforcing its contract or lien rights?


Stuart H Sakwa
Attorney at Law
ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP
www.arnstein.com<http://www.arnstein.com><http://www.arnstein.com>

515 North Flagler Drive
Sixth Floor
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401-4323
Phone: 561.650.8484
Mobile: 954.261.9598
Fax: 561.802.3082
shsakwa at arnstein.com<mailto:shsakwa at arnstein.com><mailto:shsakwa at arnstein.com>
<image002.png><http://legalnews.arnstein.com/>   <image003.jpg><http://legalnews.arnstein.com/>
Serving Clients for 120 Years
Offices in Illinois, Florida, and Wisconsin

This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or privileged information.

If you believe that you have received this message in error, please notify

the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.



Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service guidance, be advised that any federal tax

advice contained in this written or electronic communication, including any

attachments or enclosures, is not intended or written to be used and it cannot

be used by any person or entity for the purpose of (i) avoiding any tax penalties

that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service or any other U.S. Federal

taxing authority or agency or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending

to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.



_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org><mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20130628/8f646a0a/attachment.html>