[CLC-Discussion] design services

lan at lwwhiteattorney.com lan at lwwhiteattorney.com
Thu Jul 18 08:04:19 PDT 2013


The opening comment should be that every project is different, so ‘past history is not a promise of future success.’ As one possible indicator, prior to the 2008 crash, I represented a developer in a large multi-building project (13 two story office/retail/restaurant buildings plus a 3 story garage). Total project budget was just under $50 million. I don’t have the exact numbers, but remember that surveying ran somewhere in the $10-20 thousand range, civil engineers were something like $125 thousand, landscape architect was about $60 thousand, and my file copy of the contract with the architect shows architect fees (which included structural engineers they engaged) were roughly $640 thousand for plans and $210 thousand for construction administration. We had used the architects also for conceptual illustrations to use with the county for variance and permitting related stuff, and for courting lenders. They were engaged separately for that work and I don’t recall what they were paid. 

 

That would make total fees something like 2% give or take. We negotiated fees pretty hard. The architects didn’t like it, but CA was a flat fee. Hope this helps.

 

Regards,

Lan White

(727) 797-5599

 

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Mark Young
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:18 PM
To: 'George Truitt'; hroberts at carltonfields.com; clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] design services

 

A fair fee is whatever your client negotiates with the architectural firm.  By selecting the architectural firm first (before getting competitive proposals and price quotes from other design firms), your client sole sourced the architectural firm at whatever fee the architects think they can get for their services.

 

As background information…I worked as a Project Engineer in Pembroke Pines in the mid 1990’s designing subdivisions and apartment complexes when Pembroke Pines was the fastest growing city in the United States.  Land developers hired architects to create the site plan (layout of the entire subdivision, lot divisions, road layout, housepad locations, etc, which was a lot of work.  This included creating the master CAD (Computer Aided Drafting) file for the site.  Land developers hired engineers to perform the drainage design, layout water lines, sewer lines, paving and grading, permitting, etc.  In my opinion, the engineers scope of services were a lot easier than the architects.  The engineer’s designs were super-imposed upon the architect’s layout design with CAD files.  The architects did a disproportionate amount of work, but the architects’ fee was about half of the engineers’ fee.  It was a reflection of an informed consumer (land developer) and the market place: more people wanted to study architecture (creative design) than engineering (number crunching).  Good luck!

 

  

 

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of George Truitt
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:04 PM
To: 'hroberts at carltonfields.com'; 'clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] design services

 

My experience is that the design fee runs between 3% and 7% of the constrction cost. CA is hourly - $200/hr or less - most of which will be done by a junior level architect or exam eligible. 
 

From: Roberts, Hardy L. [mailto:hroberts at carltonfields.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 04:11 PM
To: CLC Discussion (clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org) <clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org> 
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] design services 
 

We seem to be having some listserv issues so I am forwarding the following on behalf of Gary Brown.

 

From: Gary L. Brown 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 4:12 PM
To: 'clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: Pardon the interruption

 

Hello all.  I need your collective opinions on something.  A firm client is in the process of hiring an architect.  The client has already selected the architect, and is in the process of negotiating the contract, and wants feedback on the proposed fee.  

 

The project consists of a large (over 30 acres) site and includes 2 phases.  One will include a new office building over 300,000 s.f. and approximately 5,000 s.f. of a retail outlet. The other will include site planning only for approximately 150,000 s.f.  The architect will provide architectural, interior design, consulting and site planning for the project.  Design and documentation services are not included in the 2nd phase but the 1st phase will include everything from conceptual design through construction documents and then construction administration.  The whole project from start to finish, design through construction, will take over 2 years.

 

I’m looking for a rough estimate for what the total fee should be or how it should be calculated. Is there a per square foot average that is “industry� standard for design services?  What is the going hourly rate for on-site construction administration services? 

 

Email your comments to gbrown at wsh-law.com.

 

Any assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated!

 

Gary

Gary L. Brown
Partner, Board Certified in Construction Law

Description: Image removed by sender. Logo

200 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1900 | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
P: (954) 763-4242    F: (954) 764-7770     <http://www.wsh-law.com> wsh-law.com |  <http://www.wsh-law.com/attorneys-vcards.php> vCard

 <http://twitter.com/Wsh_Law> Description: Image removed by sender.    <http://www.linkedin.com/company/weiss-serota-helfman-pastoriza-cole-&-boniske-p.l.> Description: Image removed by sender.    <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Weiss-Serota-Helfman-Pastoriza-Cole-Boniske-PL/259464460734365> Description: Image removed by sender. 

THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT 
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the addressee. It may contain information which is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or any action or reliance on this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (954) 763-4242 or by return e-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments. 

Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.

Gary L. Brown
Partner, Board Certified in Construction Law

 Logo <http://www.wsh-law.com/images/weiss-email-logo2.jpg> 

200 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1900 | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
P: (954) 763-4242    F: (954) 764-7770     <http://www.wsh-law.com> wsh-law.com |  <http://www.wsh-law.com/attorneys-vcards.php> vCard

 <http://twitter.com/Wsh_Law>     <http://www.linkedin.com/company/weiss-serota-helfman-pastoriza-cole-&-boniske-p.l.>     <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Weiss-Serota-Helfman-Pastoriza-Cole-Boniske-PL/259464460734365>  

THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT 
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the addressee. It may contain information which is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, use, or any action or reliance on this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (954) 763-4242 or by return e-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments. 

Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.


Confidentiality Notice: This communication is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. �� 2510-2521. It is legally privileged (including attachments) and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us so that we may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you further. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please destroy this message, and any attachments, and notify the sender by return e-mail. Thank you for your cooperation. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20130718/2d07a514/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 425 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20130718/2d07a514/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20130718/2d07a514/image002.jpg>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list